1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 540018C7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 6 Aug 2015 18:17:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com
[209.85.192.171])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB20EA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 6 Aug 2015 18:17:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pdber20 with SMTP id er20so35004959pdb.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=InOXHqsXLu+lS2AeDRkOlZhCKYxfPW2GpvsNkxjctrE=;
b=E8ogNhVG4+HYALhhmFnxBNPFu+HVIq6hLTYga6o8rFNaIAFdaHZLQYpJGC0aRSHi0c
N8iAkCHrawb67lTAbpw0XdGqhirBlPvoAWj2i32w8n+2XPyeam1L5p4NPvRu2qZBT3k4
S7yHvy9UdB6K5DjXABfqEIvzPnAKp/wGj3WZckIB5aVG+60G3JqWJb/WyFbzLchoz4YP
dOVz7jvm0utxbN443N3hmWcnAF1n3H8FbwzAx+ulTKmgb1yA4h1rU4IjJXC1Iy2JENlo
eAK904vQ5DxZkW+KcYDkBcKfjk2rsCUS5BS4mtquYf2sI8bIOgVs7zE5D7s9WU56aA5j
rWTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnuS4y3N+9NHrTyDsz/QdZIkIHQcV4J0APlycSnC7tSt78ggT1WEVkAIqrO+IkWeooydH/I
X-Received: by 10.70.8.131 with SMTP id r3mr5995104pda.62.1438885057736;
Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
[99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
t2sm7302652pdo.81.2015.08.06.11.17.35
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CALwsPgnnkbfUBhL=Qyspz13pnZ-6RHdaZOGvfLG34JjJRgt2Dw@mail.gmail.com>
<B3546CB9-6A24-474C-8B56-9B1E2D33B470@mattcorallo.com>
<CALwsPgm6xcBfLXZTNTZ40R_s3oUawE0ANZycDWpSo0cXZ+=-Vg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgQLNH+rivNNTFz6xt_9SxO3fFj7-3z7A-_B_2X2x-6M5w@mail.gmail.com>
<CALwsPgm9S3UNd3bEuWreyGS7bcvSD+cXxueoD+F_D9fC=xLz2Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSXWzCv=4cF=0bwL9+udzBHSPR7goL3U_c1NjS22dpWzQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKzdR-qPtPsxAXsmUX=vTkq-ro=EAmH7M8nL_Px_b4D4Z0WAXg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55C3A4BF.1010509@thinlink.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:17:35 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKzdR-qPtPsxAXsmUX=vTkq-ro=EAmH7M8nL_Px_b4D4Z0WAXg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Idea: Efficient bitcoin block propagation
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 18:17:38 -0000
On 8/6/2015 10:16 AM, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Is there any up to date documentation about TheBlueMatt relay network
> including what kind of block compression it is currently doing? (apart
> from the source code)
>
Another question.
Did the "relay network" relay
0000000000000000009cc829aa25b40b2cd4eb83dd498c12ad0d26d90c439d99, the
BTC Nuggets block that was invalid post-softfork? If so,
- Is there reason to believe that by so doing, it contributed to the
growth of the 2015-07-04 fork?
- Will the relay network at least validate block version numbers in the
future?
|
