Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 540018C7 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 18:17:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com [209.85.192.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB20EA for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 18:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdber20 with SMTP id er20so35004959pdb.1 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:17:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=InOXHqsXLu+lS2AeDRkOlZhCKYxfPW2GpvsNkxjctrE=; b=E8ogNhVG4+HYALhhmFnxBNPFu+HVIq6hLTYga6o8rFNaIAFdaHZLQYpJGC0aRSHi0c N8iAkCHrawb67lTAbpw0XdGqhirBlPvoAWj2i32w8n+2XPyeam1L5p4NPvRu2qZBT3k4 S7yHvy9UdB6K5DjXABfqEIvzPnAKp/wGj3WZckIB5aVG+60G3JqWJb/WyFbzLchoz4YP dOVz7jvm0utxbN443N3hmWcnAF1n3H8FbwzAx+ulTKmgb1yA4h1rU4IjJXC1Iy2JENlo eAK904vQ5DxZkW+KcYDkBcKfjk2rsCUS5BS4mtquYf2sI8bIOgVs7zE5D7s9WU56aA5j rWTA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnuS4y3N+9NHrTyDsz/QdZIkIHQcV4J0APlycSnC7tSt78ggT1WEVkAIqrO+IkWeooydH/I X-Received: by 10.70.8.131 with SMTP id r3mr5995104pda.62.1438885057736; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net. [99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t2sm7302652pdo.81.2015.08.06.11.17.35 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:17:36 -0700 (PDT) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: From: Tom Harding X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55C3A4BF.1010509@thinlink.com> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:17:35 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Idea: Efficient bitcoin block propagation X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 18:17:38 -0000 On 8/6/2015 10:16 AM, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Is there any up to date documentation about TheBlueMatt relay network > including what kind of block compression it is currently doing? (apart > from the source code) > Another question. Did the "relay network" relay 0000000000000000009cc829aa25b40b2cd4eb83dd498c12ad0d26d90c439d99, the BTC Nuggets block that was invalid post-softfork? If so, - Is there reason to believe that by so doing, it contributed to the growth of the 2015-07-04 fork? - Will the relay network at least validate block version numbers in the future?