1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
|
Return-Path: <wtogami@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D486A98C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:28:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com
[209.85.214.175])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61AF517D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:28:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbfr1 with SMTP id fr1so13292988obb.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc
:content-type; bh=w1+HL6cA75S1lXM340TBt/b7kCo94pHywisqwn4jcYo=;
b=SNIZUiUWqfh+oW4Q4YQv3YfRFZq590Z7HS+8TsBM0cs+KssZB2OrZegEE7pIiNCUzw
VlV34Bb4AnYV4jog/182p4f7csMeHiP4XCVs/Dps6ryqlXejk2uhHq5iNpjcOz2iKhjd
uZX22B6QlUfD5G1l4UJIPg1qgqq1Ak01la281cu+ve0TLf4qh/B8u47QlCGJ+cviE4kR
FYBm1SSFHDH5Y3dLAZYCWv5Tnuj55QyqaPSR/m6Zq5BCOxxphL+lQRRS3VG3Y1KuvIQh
AinQRTJ1VQx3PqQP+qWLKLHxmlyhilKuz9O4lMTZZgqPLPwiDWzgPnrl4KOQmsx8EvPz
Yr8g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.34.167 with SMTP id a7mr12129247obj.85.1440012538512;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.75.71 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADJgMzvCdHk1uo5T3rHyvpAYP1W95h7T+uMhA8vjg2BzEPzy2g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABm2gDpYdBjyCB=Dor0eE-FdPv9PbVXzWyJf0BPyQ4SDm9VznQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CADJgMzsPT7n+favkjHSuWh1YGQPZQAFLyOgxu4wDNwXSa_-3og@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcYdWyeVhfvzbW=smqinCupTEvf7sz=ctU4ht+LssM3=Tw@mail.gmail.com>
<CADJgMzvCdHk1uo5T3rHyvpAYP1W95h7T+uMhA8vjg2BzEPzy2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:28:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEz79PohW+Y1bOP1uaF9KWCMdW=dOq+kHxNa0h6pKz3RghDGjw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2c916d49273051daf0b44
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
MALFORMED_FREEMAIL,
MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Separated bitcoin-consensus mailing list (was Re:
Bitcoin XT Fork)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:28:59 -0000
--001a11c2c916d49273051daf0b44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
FYI, a few developers including Wladimir, Greg, Peter Todd, Pieter, and
Alex Morcos have been discussing what to do about improving the signal
noise ratio on bitcoin-dev list. One proposal similar to this discussion
was to split it into multiple mailing lists. It was pointed out that the
less technical Bitcoin discussion list already existed in the past and
nobody used it. Generally the discussion went away from creating yet
another mailing list and toward instituting an on-topic guidelines for
bitcoin-dev. Gavin, Wladimir, and a few of the others agreed to a simple
few paragraphs written by Alex Morcos. IIRC Wladimir agreed to post it.
Has it been posted yet?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com> wrote:
> > bitcoin-dev for protocol discussion and bitcoin-core for Bitcoin Core
> > discussion?
>
> Well -dev or both, I dont particularly see a difference at the moment,
> and establishing two lists isnt really going to make a difference so
> long as Bitcoin Core is the reference client, which it is by defacto.
> The risk of having too many lists is interested stakeholders will miss
> a discussions. Normal protocol and core discussions are usually pretty
> low volume in any case.
>
> > As Jorge notes, a general discussion list has existed for a long time
> with
> > little use.
>
> I would suggest it's only because there havent been any rules for -dev
> that would force general discussion over to the bitcoin list. On IRC
> we regularly tell people in #bitcoin-dev they are OT and ask them to
> move to #bitcoin and as a result, -dev remains quite clear of chit
> chat, #bitcoin has a steady stream of general chatter.
>
> We could reduce the OT/noise of bitcoin-dev list considerably by
> offloading the non-technical/academic debate to the bitcoin list. It
> just needs a bit of shepherding. I am more than happy to help out.
> Especially if the list already exists, we should consider making a
> decision now.
>
> Who are the moderators for that list? Do we really want to use
> sourceforge or are there alternatives, like another list on
> linuxfoundation?
>
> ping @Warren.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--001a11c2c916d49273051daf0b44
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">FYI, a few developers including Wladimir, Greg, Peter Todd=
, Pieter, and Alex Morcos have been discussing what to do about improving t=
he signal noise ratio on bitcoin-dev list.=C2=A0 One proposal similar to th=
is discussion was to split it into multiple mailing lists.=C2=A0 It was poi=
nted out that the less technical Bitcoin discussion list already existed in=
the past and nobody used it.=C2=A0 Generally the discussion went away from=
creating yet another mailing list and toward instituting an on-topic guide=
lines for bitcoin-dev.=C2=A0 Gavin, Wladimir, and a few of the others agree=
d to a simple few paragraphs written by Alex Morcos.=C2=A0 IIRC Wladimir ag=
reed to post it.=C2=A0 Has it been posted yet?<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><b=
r><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Btc Drak via=
bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linu=
xfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a=
>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 =
0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>On Wed, Aug 19,=
2015 at 3:20 PM, Jeff Garzik <<a href=3D"mailto:jgarzik@gmail.com" targ=
et=3D"_blank">jgarzik@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> bitcoin-dev for protocol discussion and bitcoin-core for Bitcoin Core<=
br>
> discussion?<br>
<br>
</span>Well -dev or both, I dont particularly see a difference at the momen=
t,<br>
and establishing two lists isnt really going to make a difference so<br>
long as Bitcoin Core is the reference client, which it is by defacto.<br>
The risk of having too many lists is interested stakeholders will miss<br>
a discussions. Normal protocol and core discussions are usually pretty<br>
low volume in any case.<br>
<span><br>
> As Jorge notes, a general discussion list has existed for a long time =
with<br>
> little use.<br>
<br>
</span>I would suggest it's only because there havent been any rules fo=
r -dev<br>
that would force general discussion over to the bitcoin list. On IRC<br>
we regularly tell people in #bitcoin-dev they are OT and ask them to<br>
move to #bitcoin and as a result, -dev remains quite clear of chit<br>
chat, #bitcoin has a steady stream of general chatter.<br>
<br>
We could reduce the OT/noise of bitcoin-dev list considerably by<br>
offloading the non-technical/academic debate to the bitcoin list. It<br>
just needs a bit of shepherding. I am more than happy to help out.<br>
Especially if the list already exists, we should consider making a<br>
decision now.<br>
<br>
Who are the moderators for that list? Do we really want to use<br>
sourceforge or are there alternatives, like another list on<br>
linuxfoundation?<br>
<br>
ping @Warren.<br>
<div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
--001a11c2c916d49273051daf0b44--
|
