1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <dsmurrell@gmail.com>) id 1Xh4mQ-0001fu-Et
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:53:22 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.215.49 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.215.49; envelope-from=dsmurrell@gmail.com;
helo=mail-la0-f49.google.com;
Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Xh4mP-0004vV-DY
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:53:22 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id q1so3726074lam.22
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.152.26.8 with SMTP id h8mr961164lag.39.1414018394741; Wed,
22 Oct 2014 15:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.82.132 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABaSBawmfP0m98jM_5qyHEoJmVK_UeBsc=Odf5QMb0Nw-pAp3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALqxMTHeipZZrJ_NSXK9vxiO83gSDgM6TA7T7XNBS3LtmuK2KA@mail.gmail.com>
<CADK=3HwNp9bMtpviZK0cyYc+UTEvm5589Obe5of7VbMZ06dJ4g@mail.gmail.com>
<CABaSBawmfP0m98jM_5qyHEoJmVK_UeBsc=Odf5QMb0Nw-pAp3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:52:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CADK=3HymjDVZKBHB0Q39C=izYNCH6hN+a7a7Mi3jeMF7E=O6qQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(dsmurrell[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.8 THIS_AD "This ad" and variants
X-Headers-End: 1Xh4mP-0004vV-DY
Cc: Bitcoin-Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] side-chains & 2-way pegging (Re: is there
a way to do bitcoin-staging?)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:53:22 -0000
Sorry Bryan, this was the first paper posted to this list since I've
been on it that I added to my site. I was quite excited about this.
I was not planning on and certainly won't be making this advertisement
after every paper posted on this list (I may do it on reddit). I did
post on reddit a few times yes, but I assumed that this list's user
base didn't overlap extremely (does it?). I'm not sure why my posts
got down voted there. The down voters gave me no constructive feedback
about the usefulness of my site, and neither have you.
Are you able to give me your feedback on the site I've spent quite
some time setting up privately so that we don't spam this list again?
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> p.s. I'm not trying to monetize this site. I just tried to make
>> something I thought could be useful.
>
> [Unsolicited administrivia follows.]
>
> You have been posting this in a bunch of places for a while now, at
> least three times today by my count on other mediums. I also observed
> negative karma scores associated with these posts. Maybe you could
> consider toning down the message frequency? I think by now everyone
> knows you want them to use your site. I also think that in the limit
> that it would be inappropriate for /everyone/ to post all possible
> research sites, or even vaguely topical discussion sites, for every
> paper posted. Personally, I would much rather have discussions happen
> on the mailing list anyway, although if I had a different opinion I
> certainly hope I would still send this message.
>
> Thank you.
>
> - Bryan
> http://heybryan.org/
> 1 512 203 0507
|
