Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.215.49 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.215.49; envelope-from=dsmurrell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-la0-f49.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABaSBawmfP0m98jM_5qyHEoJmVK_UeBsc=Odf5QMb0Nw-pAp3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALqxMTHeipZZrJ_NSXK9vxiO83gSDgM6TA7T7XNBS3LtmuK2KA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADK=3HwNp9bMtpviZK0cyYc+UTEvm5589Obe5of7VbMZ06dJ4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABaSBawmfP0m98jM_5qyHEoJmVK_UeBsc=Odf5QMb0Nw-pAp3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:52:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CADK=3HymjDVZKBHB0Q39C=izYNCH6hN+a7a7Mi3jeMF7E=O6qQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin-Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] side-chains & 2-way pegging (Re: is there
 a way to do bitcoin-staging?)
Precedence: list

Sorry Bryan, this was the first paper posted to this list since I've
been on it that I added to my site. I was quite excited about this.

I was not planning on and certainly won't be making this advertisement
after every paper posted on this list (I may do it on reddit). I did
post on reddit a few times yes, but I assumed that this list's user
base didn't overlap extremely (does it?). I'm not sure why my posts
got down voted there. The down voters gave me no constructive feedback
about the usefulness of my site, and neither have you.

Are you able to give me your feedback on the site I've spent quite
some time setting up privately so that we don't spam this list again?


On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> p.s. I'm not trying to monetize this site. I just tried to make
>> something I thought could be useful.
>
> [Unsolicited administrivia follows.]
>
> You have been posting this in a bunch of places for a while now, at
> least three times today by my count on other mediums. I also observed
> negative karma scores associated with these posts. Maybe you could
> consider toning down the message frequency? I think by now everyone
> knows you want them to use your site. I also think that in the limit
> that it would be inappropriate for /everyone/ to post all possible
> research sites, or even vaguely topical discussion sites, for every
> paper posted. Personally, I would much rather have discussions happen
> on the mailing list anyway, although if I had a different opinion I
> certainly hope I would still send this message.
>
> Thank you.
>
> - Bryan
> http://heybryan.org/
> 1 512 203 0507