summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/web/ufHelp/Q7.html
blob: a3ac9ab6b879cb3b0a2e87dade7d488cd904fce0 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
<head>
<script>
	function loadPercentile(name, startK5, startK50, startK95, stopK5, stopK50, stopK95) {
			var args = 
					{
							"caption": "Loaded our interpretation of " + name + "\'s probability.",
							"Q7.y2010.0k5.0": startK5,
							"Q7.y2010.0k50.0": startK50,
							"Q7.y2010.0k95.0": startK95,
							"Q7.y2070.0k5.0": stopK5,
							"Q7.y2070.0k50.0": stopK50,
							"Q7.y2070.0k95.0": stopK95

					};
			top.loadData(args);
	}
</script>
</head>
<body>
What is the probability
that there will be a nuclear war between now and 2070 so severe that
it sets progress towards human-level AI back decades or centuries? 
For this model, you may set a constant probability per year/decade or
have it go up or down over time at a constant rate.</P>
<P CLASS="western" STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in">First, think about
current political conditions. How likely is nuclear war now? Your
answer for this will go on the left-hand side of the graph, near
2010.</P>
<P CLASS="western" STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in">Then, think about what
conditions may be like in 2070. Maybe nuclear war will become more likely as
weapons technologies proliferate. Maybe nuclear war will become less likely
as global political institutions improve. Your answer for 2070 will
go on the right-hand side of the graph, near 2070.
</P>
<UL>
	<LI><P CLASS="western" STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in">
	<B>Claim:</B>
	Stanford Professor Martin Hellman, who has researched the topic for
	decades, estimates a 1% annual probability of nuclear war between
	major nuclear powers. Reviewing the literature, he found no other
	references on the annual probability of nuclear war. <BR>
	<B>Implication:</B>
	Although 1% is probably more likely than 0.001% or 50%, little
	serious research has been done and probability distributions should
	be wide.
	<input type="button" onclick="loadPercentile('Hellman', -2.7061, -2.0, -1.301, -2.7061, -2.0, -1.301);" value="Load distribution"</input><BR>
	<B>Source: </B>Hellman, Martin E. &quot;Risk Analysis of
	Nuclear Deterrence.&quot; The Bent Spring 2008: 14-22. Defusing the
	Nuclear Threat. 9 Aug. 2008 &lt;<FONT COLOR="#000080"><U><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://www.nuclearrisk.org/paper.pdf" TARGET="_blank">http://www.nuclearrisk.org/paper.pdf</A></U></FONT>&gt;.
	</P>
	<LI><P CLASS="western">
	<B>Claim:</B> Many experts estimate the
	annual risk of a nuclear terrorist attack at around
	1%-5%.<BR>
	<B>Implication:</B> Rogue nuclear bombings, which may lead
	to nuclear retaliation and subsequent escalation into full-scale
	nuclear war, are not impossible and may be quite likely in the next
	10-20 years.
	<input type="button" onclick="loadPercentile('Lugar', -2.6021, -2.1249, -1.622, -2.6026, -2.3010, -2.0);" value="Load distribution"</input><BR>
	<B>Source:</B> Lugar, Richard G., United States Senator for
	Indiana. The Lugar Survey on
	Proliferation Threats and Responses. Washington, D.C.: Office of
	Senator Lugar, 2005.<BR> 9 Aug. 2008 &lt;<U><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://lugar.senate.gov/reports/npsurvey.pdf" TARGET="_blank">http://lugar.senate.gov/reports/npsurvey.pdf</A></U>&gt;.
	Pg. 22.</P>
	<LI><P CLASS="western">
	<B>Claim:</B> The US has expressed
	willingness to use nuclear weapons under very broad circumstances,
	even when no other WMDs are involved.<BR>
	<B>Implication:</B>
	Generals and other officials are not that reluctant to use nuclear
	weapons, making a nuclear escalation probable.<BR>
	<B>Source:</B>
	U.S. Department of Defense. Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations.
	Joint Publication 3-12. Final Coordination (2). Mar. 15, 2005. 9
	Aug. 2008
	&lt;<FONT COLOR="#000080"><U><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/policy/dod/jp3_12fc2.pdf" TARGET="_blank">http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/policy/dod/jp3_12fc2.pdf</A></U></FONT>&gt;.</P>
	<LI><P CLASS="western">
	<B>Claim:</B> During the Cold War, a US
	research paper used estimates ranging around 1%-5% annually for
	nuclear war risk models.<BR>
	<B>Implication:</B> High political
	tensions can lead to significant annual probabilities of nuclear
	war.<BR>
	<B>Source:</B> Avenhaus, Rudolf, Steven J. Brams, John
	Fichtner, and Marc D. Kilgour. &quot;The Probability of Nuclear
	War&quot;. Rep.No. 86-24. C.V. Starr Center for&nbsp;Applied
	Economics, New York University. 5 Aug. 2008. IDEAS. RePEc. 9 <BR>Aug.
	2008 &lt;<U><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://ideas.repec.org/p/cvs/starer/86-24.html">http://ideas.repec.org/p/cvs/starer/86-24.html</A></U>&gt;.
		</P>
	<LI><P CLASS="western">
	<B>Claim:</B> Even a relatively small nuclear
	war could disrupt global climate for a decade or more.<BR>
	<B>Implication:</B>
	  Indirect damage from nuclear war could greatly exceed direct
	destruction.<BR>
	<B>Source:</B> &quot;Regional Nuclear War Could
	Devastate Global Climate.&quot; ScienceDaily. 11 Dec. 2006.
	Retrieved 9 Aug. 2008.
	&lt;<FONT COLOR="#000080"><U><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061211090729.htm" TARGET="_blank">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061211090729.htm</A></U></FONT>&gt;.</P>
</UL>
<UL>
	<LI><P CLASS="western" STYLE="margin-bottom: 0.19in">
	<B>Claim:</B>
	Between 1956 and 1979, there have been at least 20 mishaps that
	could have led to accidental nuclear war between the US and USSR.
	Even if the chance of each one leading to a war was small, when so
	many pile up, the overall chance of disaster may be
	substantial.<BR>
	<B>Implication:</B> Even if there are no outright
	hostilities, a full-scale nuclear war may occur simply by accident.
	Once a war gets started, it may be difficult to stop. <BR>
	<B>Source:</B>
	Phillips, Alan F. &quot;20 Mishaps that Might Have Started
	Accidental Nuclear War.&quot; Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. Jan.
	1998. Retrieved 9 Aug. 2008.
	&lt;<FONT COLOR="#000080"><U><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/1998/01/00_phillips_20-mishaps.htm" TARGET="_blank">http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/1998/01/00_phillips_20-mishaps.htm</A></U></FONT>&gt;.</P>
</UL>
</body>