summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fb/03bc8c9a0446004b240b34f3fda3e4a0fbdd76
blob: 0b3af627bdcabcda725e7a5aca8fe541df4675fc (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
Return-Path: <adam@cypherspace.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F32BD9D
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:52:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78DA1A5
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:52:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com ([209.85.213.171]) by
	mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id
	0MDOgd-1ZmtmP1oth-00GmJH for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:52:40 +0200
Received: by igbhv6 with SMTP id hv6so2814301igb.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.57.84 with SMTP id g20mr21597882igq.18.1444769559774;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.85.135 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOUBo+9D7LQ-S6Rown_sbxxb9366cQj0c0HcU72B=4sBmmS0rg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOoPuRasL-fmQJMfmF-JVyogdMy0EVKfhUAmT44DxQq--XCdKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOUBo+9D7LQ-S6Rown_sbxxb9366cQj0c0HcU72B=4sBmmS0rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:52:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CALqxMTH+2BCLHaGjZN_1SP0rEk=jtQDNiTLmJKZKLiYJxa6-EQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>
To: Daniel Newton <djpnewton@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:m/Jxqi1OVNQNJma+jdRdBIOv0m5KC/I79sdsHZqkvS/yJ4NYEN/
	syG9GlAvnk+U4MOD2NJcaAFA0a5gqzHZasOARF6djiFJYKW33RbTQ69pojM5KwcV5lYJgZ3
	GQCHdxOl8BipVYqxCiQ2/hd6A8ZWk4WBmXWjH8r1h0zl3NXROCuLFjJYLpucb+fJA8e5kfd
	SVZSbYrVvdfMgQ28tkmhA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:YiAW0Eu96R8=:uy7tI2IXBn4/yO/mlmSKky
	HjGJdMHW2Temd31i7fPyTwnPcwXv+ZCQELceEo/KdK2GcW6/3E20qBm7OGtNtKx7omFhkEMna
	pwarXRb0iesSR/yZDp960uxftwkTENtXvNr1uQ3q81w3P4/gKpee4RlysOWGLrWcmpJLswJTd
	LlDXTWHyU74lREe/sHjGWr6qyZrJitzeQcFxrdaxuGZo61ZgkASr/6HYgZw2P99Epa3dfr3/R
	w+17VlnzWx3M+6WaLfj7TeT8qONk/oqyovBh8W2ivDoGwAL9zJ1sVVgHikZIkgz+LFGe8SEvw
	eGz629RYx6ON/uc/o6c6uhLwCl+3Z1rrOju6sou119liqVhb/Xc6DMgMnJA0JpQ276liFzYWd
	sj9k4Kge8lfvbS1vyD1DvRSPgQCTvAFNhQ+j6nSn6Mhk6NjteFnnwW/yAsIHbEVy4YvSkbt+i
	+caLnu5NvyijJ6Gog6viZTr1idh314J4DWYAfkJepMmdFNRpJP7iJ5EF4D/x51YqRRmZTXgAw
	1wyHDcjAV9CewqYxAW8QKuojeE2SIzrfiUBYhVTH7KwWDSuyZQU/w2vezi6+V5eR4W4LUseIa
	F3oVMV5w2N14CwcuUJtV0cG2fhUKolVkRST1WqG4ze92DionHXbugcEPZ4DpZjLL9SflZHbdN
	EX+Wu+H3Lt2TVqdTakvzHv5l7RzQZXj/OVWA90nZ6o3iLj+OwKZ/KzDgNfQsu4HBXZ6NeVZF8
	/VZVzKCMLsE3YO3P
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Liquid
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:52:42 -0000

Benjamin you may want to read this reddit thread on liquid:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3ok69l/blockstream_to_launch_firs=
t_sidechain_for_bitcoin/

and if you feel your questions are not answered, post them there?

(This list is about bitcoin development so it's not really on topic for her=
e).

Adam

On 13 October 2015 at 21:37, Daniel Newton via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>Again =E2=80=93 what does Bitcoin have to do with =E2=80=9Cmarket liquidi=
ty=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Ccapital
>> requirements=E2=80=9D?
>
> You seem to be conflating bitcoin with blockstream/liquid. Your question
> does not make sense.
>
>>Does Blockstream have commercial products now?
>
> Yes. I am sure that was always their plan in order to stay a viable
> commercial entity
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Benjamin via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I was very surprised to learn that Blockstream will implement Sidechains
>> for exchanges [1], [2] and has been working on this privately. Can someb=
ody
>> explain this =E2=80=9Cannouncement=E2=80=9D? Just a few comments on this=
 =E2=80=9Cproposal=E2=80=9D.
>>
>> =E2=80=9CThis new construction establishes a security profile inherently=
 superior
>> to existing methods of rapid transfer and settlement, and is directly
>> applicable to other problems within existing financial institutions.=E2=
=80=9D
>>
>> First of all, what does Bitcoin have to do with existing financial
>> institutions? Secondly, what in do you mean by =E2=80=9Crapid transfer=
=E2=80=9D and
>> "settlement"? Bitcoin is anonymous, digital cash. There is no such thing=
 as
>> settlement, there is only the transfer of digital cash and that's it
>> (settlement is a bad word for this kind of transfer of property). If you
>> make up new terms define them accurately and don't play the
>> crypto-buzzword-bingo game.
>>
>> =E2=80=9CThis, in addition to increasing the security of funds normally =
subject to
>> explicit counterparty risk, fosters conditions that increase market
>> liquidity and reduce capital requirements for on-blockchain business
>> models.=E2=80=9D
>>
>> Again =E2=80=93 what does Bitcoin have to do with =E2=80=9Cmarket liquid=
ity=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Ccapital
>> requirements=E2=80=9D?
>>
>> =E2=80=9CBlockstream's innovative solutions are definitely a game change=
r for the
>> Bitcoin industry.=E2=80=9D
>>
>> Does Blockstream have commercial products now?
>>
>> "These initial launch partners include Bitfinex, BTCC, Kraken, Unocoin,
>> and Xapo, and discussions are underway with another dozen major
>> institutional traders and licensed exchanges. "
>>
>> ??? so many questions and no answers.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Benjamin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>