summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/f9/01b07f9cc1ba8a4d9fbe56c844d54d83c57ac1
blob: dbdd53fccc3bb976a9e968900c351185cf3909cd (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1VOc8U-0003ZQ-Gh
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:35:18 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.212.171 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.212.171; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-wi0-f171.google.com; 
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1VOc8Q-0005y5-8z
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:35:18 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hm2so4609711wib.4
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.36.139 with SMTP id q11mr12477657wij.9.1380065708083;
	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.156.163 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0H9TVfQ3AGv6aBmS1DUa6MTWhSFAN1Jo4eimBEBQhPZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T0Ly67ZNJhoRQk0L9Q0-ucq3e=24b5Tg6GRKspRKKtP-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<521298F0.20108@petersson.at>
	<CABsx9T3b--tfUmaxJxsXyM2f3Cw4M1oX1nX8o9WkW_haBmLctA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP2BOWk4FOUx4eVHvXmdSgx3zo_o18J8YBi2Uc_WkBAXKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP0H9TVfQ3AGv6aBmS1DUa6MTWhSFAN1Jo4eimBEBQhPZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:35:07 +1000
Message-ID: <CABsx9T0TQ6Gg=muNP-rCZxan8_nAqeJt6ErYVOfnLJKrsLs81w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f502c4c4c119b04e7299671
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VOc8Q-0005y5-8z
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol: BIP 70, 71, 72
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:35:18 -0000

--e89a8f502c4c4c119b04e7299671
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:

> BTW, on the "make qrcodes more scannable" front -- is it too late to
> change BIP 72 so the new param is just "r" instead of "request"? Every byte
> helps when it comes to qrcodes ...
>

Not too late, assuming there are no objections. Smaller QR codes is a very
good reason to change it.

-- 
--
Gavin Andresen

--e89a8f502c4c4c119b04e7299671
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Mike Hearn <span dir=3D"=
ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net" target=3D"_blank">mike@plan99.n=
et</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_=
quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-=
left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr">BTW, on the &quot;make qrcodes more scannable&quot; front =
-- is it too late to change BIP 72 so the new param is just &quot;r&quot; i=
nstead of &quot;request&quot;? Every byte helps when it comes to qrcodes ..=
.</div>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Not too late, assuming there are no object=
ions. Smaller QR codes is a very good reason to change it.</div><div>=A0</d=
iv></div>-- <br>--<br>Gavin Andresen<br>
</div></div>

--e89a8f502c4c4c119b04e7299671--