1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
|
Return-Path: <laanwj@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB08A1A71
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:29:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com
[209.85.212.179])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743C21D4
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:29:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so116014776wic.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 21 Sep 2015 06:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to;
bh=IdULEWCJo6cE7qf56kKuXeo/Ty9lINGUgB4XFtt/Hu4=;
b=ljbZjacC9QFXbAdDy5UeNsHorO3mw3ZZJXHRnc9BS+q4Atg7HuGTW9CsTjIodg+T5e
4hhpt3OMwnxncko/Guwa/hL6mXRCHbQZOfEgfevtEQSnHBziGnOGN/07MHsOHws7nj+h
kEDifLfm31ajW1/IxbFYQd+4WSoJNJp6VDv7owuihWtfKzIEj4Uxu57SthRw55LpawDx
Kfla1PkRqz0BbG3PqwPcqeUucFs0J2qGEOeeYei7WVUSNlVDSW3yRioSyBKxJHgE0wFt
yb85aNBr5BTWCW+whBo9KELUNWElRFl6O44dPFlKDbTfTWpYCwpsmU3DWeIiWxRgAq2L
cmvg==
X-Received: by 10.194.158.68 with SMTP id ws4mr25704880wjb.25.1442842156984;
Mon, 21 Sep 2015 06:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amethyst.visucore.com (dhcp-089-098-228-253.chello.nl.
[89.98.228.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
uo6sm24160569wjc.1.2015.09.21.06.29.15
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 21 Sep 2015 06:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:29:15 +0200
From: "Wladimir J. van der Laan" <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20150921132914.GA2702@amethyst.visucore.com>
References: <20150918010709.GB5251@amethyst.visucore.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150918010709.GB5251@amethyst.visucore.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>, Cory Fields <cory@coryfields.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weekly development meetings on IRC
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:29:19 -0000
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:07:10AM +0200, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> At Monday's code sprint we had a good idea to schedule a regular developer meeting in #bitcoin-dev.
>
> Attendance is of course voluntary, but it may be good to have a time that many people are expected to be present and current issues can be discussed.
>
> Any preference for days/times?
>
> What about e.g. every week 15:00-16:00 UTC on Thursday?
From Jonasschnelli's doodle ( http://doodle.com/poll/cihug53sa8u4h2in#table ) it appears that Thursday 19:00 UTC - 20:00 UTC is the most popular time.
I think scheduling the meeting in UTC (=Iceland time) makes sense internationally because different locales have different DST or no DST at all, so all in all that makes it more complex. It's true that this can make a convenient time less convenient half of the year, for some people, but I don't think there's a time that works for everyone anyway...
Wladimir
|
