1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
|
Return-Path: <simon@bitcartel.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34918E3C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:40:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com
[209.85.220.50])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C817A199
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:40:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by padfa1 with SMTP id fa1so13221704pad.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=XR4GYm/W5bWIfFGmWJP6Mri890riSEEqTPK2VQvaln8=;
b=WGoNL4yR/1a3yzWvlYncICphCeNSRp4COZvfpcKbhjtDRWmRDPRmcYJvWWu6FbOy8l
ufllHEDaMpfKIT3D1Sjre1rrt46hCIuPbb0RAB2zl2/dlISlhvwSkO9Yc++Hq/7eY2C5
iWYCORQ2sVBx6UYzlKH9TCrcyis3RSYU1fyAMVqShX5L8+VVz5/IBv9leut6OO40hPwr
oyUAYE1vkuWRLlZTnScfXxLljQ8l+bwFdOT98VDxcHhJlSJDomFh/KqGuYER8aL2ZFTl
ZFJS6EDWi4XdlKVwsf8I2cbmEIENfR4qa+tWg8d4leNwDvLLwy1891pKX/Q94KaL8K1m
FDfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlSAXvNLiey9U9rhe5NeOl0o1yfXGChpY5D0HJgHo0HAUY3/hvOF9NKL8gLBWK/XzcAI5IR
X-Received: by 10.68.248.102 with SMTP id yl6mr72166875pbc.66.1441309255475;
Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.13] (c-24-5-43-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net.
[24.5.43.190]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
hz5sm26145327pbb.39.2015.09.03.12.40.54
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55E8A246.7030102@bitcartel.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:40:54 -0700
From: Simon Liu <simon@bitcartel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>, Bitcoin development mailing list
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <CADm_WcZyK6LUcuKqSEuR-q0hTZOC3EdJsqY1HrS_ow0knDY=7A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADm_WcZyK6LUcuKqSEuR-q0hTZOC3EdJsqY1HrS_ow0knDY=7A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 100 specification
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 19:40:56 -0000
Hi Jeff,
Thoughts on this part of the proposal:
"Absent/invalid votes are counted as votes for the current hardLimit.
Out of range votes are counted as the nearest in-range value."
1. Why should an absent vote be considered a vote for the status quo? A
non-voter should have zero impact on the result.
2. Why should out of range votes be counted? They're an invalid vote, a
spoiled ballot as such, and thus it would be better if they were discarded.
Regards,
Simon
On 09/02/2015 08:33 PM, Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> BIP 100 initial public
> draft: https://github.com/jgarzik/bip100/blob/master/bip-0100.mediawiki
>
> Emphasis on "initial" This is a starting point for the usual open
> source feedback/iteration cycle, not an endpoint that Must Be This Way.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
|
