1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
|
Return-Path: <eric@voskuil.org>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0841C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 3 May 2022 18:26:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B7281C58
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 3 May 2022 18:26:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=voskuil-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id nM8q0W2YwpTw
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 3 May 2022 18:26:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D7181C44
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 3 May 2022 18:26:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id iq10so16089958pjb.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 03 May 2022 11:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=voskuil-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id
:references:cc:in-reply-to:to;
bh=+X9A1Mr9d6kdwGllhbeh9tGE+UvhwNAZMx1CZjTB9T8=;
b=5OEZWmRsNm2vmShUBhzFx//IzpBOF52emWoCorbC6sv6abTSjPLV5OtGRNRn98Rn+7
qxwuJBcOgdfqhG1Ip3CvkroN/6FuoxIJwguo1lWCr30e2dfuRt8GUgkwsmbS2dR2uDq2
OCp8OTeSmjvGT+Owg/dt0JCiPFTFCdVMPRqmM59/Qqidd5VDzv5cgvyF0H/egjMp41Ty
K1ntiMygtTjef2c6ioW0TtW8+L0xbzt1UAPwQDTp+2uz4E/VxEFsXf2jWTdnH/4vI7ZZ
n1R8LNZYF7ZW5QFu/bHejD+kMrGXB1AR2+oopEEKIslAuC1VdkIipV+alhqjIk4KEBCX
ShUw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version
:subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to;
bh=+X9A1Mr9d6kdwGllhbeh9tGE+UvhwNAZMx1CZjTB9T8=;
b=smSmg1hvurGSGOAbDz9tGjg7qjlFyTpRHADEd+nMQ2BxqkHnZkefjN78eLcgpLVNqh
VvxSzFLQl88ugCpO4Ci44ecje7Q4XXyoqPcNq4mwfNLUZdmrG6Eyll/ae8BLC6U7AJ0p
Y2QiS9fct0I9NCkxYVEQXwkqDC3zw9vAy0308NfTPpusK7Jpy/eMdXs3NuNcij20k0K2
s/zab7r4CdBfKeZKKPt8YwyQtdGKW+hfGG6pz/bOf2UoiDy1NNnsBudCjicA2M/8R0du
g/2bKRng8MDRD9aHbncnwgxdxWWHB0gL2f8UD5qB25/E/kVUjXPFtcSY7t8L9DJqrutD
sBXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vUYusFTX7Bnux09BRMY5o0uZapRuW9bYfG0DM4GTygJDITd9L
mh5EalqwK/AEhQ6Kc/63XP0I0A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz21/SUSd9dcfSoO4rX8WLpo8njoD7UXEK7NJhX6jM9KbXqkRYX4KakLqnVU23l+kTbUgUqUg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4a4f:b0:1dc:79d9:8505 with SMTP id
lb15-20020a17090b4a4f00b001dc79d98505mr6016896pjb.43.1651602414815;
Tue, 03 May 2022 11:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:380:8039:dc28:bdff:6312:d39:8a99])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
d25-20020aa78699000000b0050dc7628140sm6586775pfo.26.2022.05.03.11.26.54
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 03 May 2022 11:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 11:26:52 -0700
Message-Id: <48D4B621-D862-4031-AE43-3F54D34FB0B5@voskuil.org>
References: <f3892570-6c45-47ee-2804-9988ff18bdf5@riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <f3892570-6c45-47ee-2804-9988ff18bdf5@riseup.net>
To: Chris Belcher <belcher@riseup.net>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19E258)
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Timelocked address fidelity bond
for BIP39 seeds
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 18:26:57 -0000
It looks like you are talking about lending where the principal return is gu=
aranteed by covenant at maturity. This make the net present value of the loa=
n zero.
e
> On May 3, 2022, at 11:03, Chris Belcher via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists=
.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFHello ZmnSCPxj,
>=20
> Such a system will have to be publicly advertised, in the same way we see c=
entralized cryptocurrency staking shops buying ads all over the place. That'=
s how they'll make retail hodlers aware that renting out your coins in this w=
ay is possible. If JoinMarket/Teleport users notice such ads appearing then w=
e could change the taker code to remove the intermediate certificate keypair=
, and have the fidelity bond UTXO key sign the endpoint (IRC nickname or oni=
on hostname) directly. This removes the possibility of fidelity bonds in col=
d storage. It would have to be done for privacy, and it wouldn't be too bad.=
Right now there's no cold storage solution for fidelity bonds yet JoinMarke=
t has about 600 bitcoins locked up and advertised, which must be all on hot w=
allets.
>=20
> Best,
> CB
>=20
>> On 03/05/2022 06:26, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
>> Good morning Chris,
>>> Hello ZmnSCPxj,
>>>=20
>>> Renting out fidelity bonds is an interesting idea. It might happen in
>>> the situation where a hodler wants to generate yield but doesn't want
>>> the hassle of running a full node and yield generator. A big downside of=
>>> it is that the yield generator income is random while the rent paid is a=
>>> fixed cost, so there's a chance that the income won't cover the rent.
>> The fact that *renting* is at all possible suggests to me that the follow=
ing situation *could* arise:
>> * A market of lessors arises.
>> * A surveillor creates multiple identities.
>> * Each fake identity rents separately from multiple lessors.
>> * Surveillor gets privacy data by paying out rent money to the lessor mar=
ket.
>> In defiads, I and Tamas pretty much concluded that rental would happen in=
evitably.
>> One could say that defiads was a kind of fidelity bond system.
>> Our solution for defiads was to prioritize propagating advertisements (ro=
ughly equivalent to the certificates in your system, I think) with larger bo=
nded values * min(bonded_time, 1 year).
>> However, do note that we did not intend defiads to be used for privacy-se=
nsitive applications like JoinMarket/Teleport.
>> Regards,
>> ZmnSCPxj
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
