summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/f4/2ca90547dcf8606b1b5cdee51e7230bd677296
blob: 35566dc5a1248836183d04835544a4567c0ef2ab (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
Return-Path: <satoshin@mybitcoincenter.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41B351A24
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  1 Apr 2019 03:29:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:22:07 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from gateway21.websitewelcome.com (gateway21.websitewelcome.com
	[192.185.46.113])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B712287
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  1 Apr 2019 03:29:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cm11.websitewelcome.com (cm11.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.5])
	by gateway21.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B316B400C9259
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 31 Mar 2019 22:07:43 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gator4219.hostgator.com ([108.167.189.45]) by cmsmtp with SMTP
	id AnIVhLE1CdnCeAnIVhB5fp; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 22:07:43 -0500
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=mybitcoincenter.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:
	Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:
	Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:
	Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:
	List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=SKKtrhoT6tUZKD4ZmRevXXoD9ivsFxwm6jWiBnCIOXc=;
	b=jdvuF+JUb4mVt/kZxummc+VsE
	QOKMobuhrR/HIIBxCM8SdpdxXtFc4nEXNgSPYpwCT3izy+DqaBDMfhvdIYz+kyZAxYKwez2w50lts
	UNWC05b0911OMtR53ZKGNqVx/5ijDjj3N27Gq3J0HYmnuBM8kjdl6ib86nN4RuMpmpN9QftG8mLgH
	MOaeWxS/e5vwS7s7Opm4sJdN5aMuFisN851w9CYrwgdFQX7+JA/4StfTd8qAZv2flrIezSOwwcZT+
	NOevjL4aYo5CEJ6J9pgINjx/PzzsuiZOSznobc/uvz/0vhka23p28wzSB8t7J6BPz1gF9KpVM6Xpj
	O2B8jtXkg==;
Received: from ool-18b96cf0.dyn.optonline.net ([24.185.108.240]:59221
	helo=[10.0.0.10]) by gator4219.hostgator.com with esmtpsa
	(TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.91)
	(envelope-from <satoshin@mybitcoincenter.com>)
	id 1hAnIV-002ztg-H2; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 22:07:43 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Satoshin <satoshin@mybitcoincenter.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190401011112.6icdkyjocf4qh5oz@petertodd.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 23:07:41 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5D9DDB14-9E0F-419B-A069-25448F1FA473@mybitcoincenter.com>
References: <201904010030.34825.luke@dashjr.org>
	<20190401011112.6icdkyjocf4qh5oz@petertodd.org>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
	please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator4219.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - mybitcoincenter.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 24.185.108.240
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1hAnIV-002ztg-H2
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
X-Source-Sender: ool-18b96cf0.dyn.optonline.net ([10.0.0.10])
	[24.185.108.240]:59221
X-Source-Auth: satoshin@mybitcoincenter.com
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: bXlvZmZpY2VzO215b2ZmaWNlcztnYXRvcjQyMTkuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 04:23:42 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Softfork proposal for minimum price of $50k
	USD/BTC
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 03:29:52 -0000

Hi Everyone,
     First portion of your First BIP is excellent- with this field the =
protocol can actually attain HFT- by  pinning of value at time of trade =
for later unblock scaling as a mark to market tool which is used in HFT.

The Second BIP of a minimum price would never allow Bitcoin to pass the =
SEC test of a viable asset. - I hope that portion was actually a Joke =
since it makes no sense economically.=20
If one has ever seen a stock drop 90% in one day then you would =
understand the volatile nature of future valuation.

Prices have to be able to go higher and lower based on market demand and =
not tethering to perceived norms. If the US dollar was crashed and it =
went down to Venezuelan currency levels [hypothetically then where would =
your 50k limit lead the currency} Never say never-=20

Best Regards
XX
=20
> On Mar 31, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev =
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:30:34AM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev =
wrote:
>> Certain parts of the community have been selling bitcoins for =
unreasonably
>> low prices. This has halted Bitcoin's valuation at $20k and even =
driven the
>> price down below $15k! However, clearly Bitcoin is worth much more =
than
>> that, and there is widespread support for higher prices.
>>=20
>> In light of this, I have written and implemented two BIPs: one to add =
a
>> signed price field to Bitcoin transactions, and the other to softfork =
a
>> minimum price of $50k USD/BTC a year from today.
>=20
> I believe I've found a serious vulnerability in your proposal: there's =
no limit
> on the maximum supply of USD.
>=20
> --=20
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev