1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1VptSU-0005MJ-5M
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 05:32:42 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
designates 209.85.212.179 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.212.179; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
helo=mail-wi0-f179.google.com;
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VptSS-00012a-TI
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 05:32:42 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id z2so3174607wiv.0
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:32:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=HVbJ9LPIQMXI9bigjZdMb23Ig0RVTgl1REmZjlnHfKI=;
b=Xif4aPbFw9evT3icwpbk48gzAqCFGOFSJ55MBsIxyFm+H7DudiHvHMVMMjd38M7/Yg
0OAZeA8R+WncZi0Rh8G3weW8j3kl/O5x/xVSjqKGZW+pJ3X8IkrrYHhZ/SS49jvSCQd9
KWNPzCe4eNmJcFtA4xSgdDCWHXYjV//krzuldqFm4dG02hzbnGQkqe7+vgY8dwX3mNA1
PFtHjMIZhxY9J0V6NaTun9u4e93EUxiU892HWtA1DJDpO472DUT8n5vKvdl6MFbCj4qE
UmjYtaxEkc8y1blcb8Yh5NkqVcnX6R1GAlCHXzaSnQOinNLh58V+PcDyTNwUPCuZuUgD
5Fyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnqYNmCaE1nN0GjTnXc3ETxxQmeZsRrswcSlVQYa9EjoUhyqa2vLMpiIzS0eozpBwsCgAzn
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.104.42 with SMTP id gb10mr13512683wjb.16.1386567154704;
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 21:32:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.164.164 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:32:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0YyLd-zwniE-FUT4AG2Zemp2SBrwF8gskTf3LgsKfByw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <52A3C8A5.7010606@gmail.com>
<1795f3067ba3fcdd0caf978cc59ff024.squirrel@fruiteater.riseup.net>
<52A435EA.7090405@gmail.com> <201312081237.24473.luke@dashjr.org>
<CANAnSg2OrmQAcZ+cZdtQeADicH3U29QOgYPfP1AQhOMP6+P1wg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgR0khyJxmz9c2Oc87hOFgiNuiPJuaeugGajdo_EcKEW9w@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP3+AowZZS1=hAkx0KODiT-vbcRKyZaHOE2CWaJk3y5-Dw@mail.gmail.com>
<52A4E199.3000209@gmail.com>
<20131208215850.GE62848@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
<CANEZrP0YyLd-zwniE-FUT4AG2Zemp2SBrwF8gskTf3LgsKfByw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 03:32:34 -0200
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0MXUXVC9vgvrC8wBU=6wwZm4A85yUBA+UguXZPCzwXMxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: plan99.net]
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VptSS-00012a-TI
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dedicated server for bitcoin.org,
your thoughts?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 05:32:42 -0000
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
> I bring this up because of the recent bitcointalk fiasco. AFAIK the domains
> are registered and controlled in the same way. It's likely that the current
> registrar isn't very secure.
I registered bitcointalk.org originally, then passed along control.
It is likely that the two domains are /not/ registered and controlled
in the same way.
The handling of bitcointalk.org was quite disappointing. Even after
"control" passed from me to Sirius, he did not bother to change the
registrar credentials for months afterward, despite repeated urging.
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
|
