1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C8392
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:43:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148109.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail148109.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.148.109])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07CE179
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:43:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247])
by punt22.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u5NChAQ3059085;
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:43:10 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u5NCh5Mc043295
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:43:06 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41E9540110;
Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:41:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 67FCC20217; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:43:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:43:04 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160623124304.GA20280@fedora-21-dvm>
References: <CAJowKg+zYtUnHv+ea--srehVa5K46sjpWbHVcVGRY5x0w5XRTQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20160621221347.GC10196@fedora-21-dvm>
<CABqynxJCiXL0djx+xt9i=HJqC=0=5sZ9ecL7k1_a_XHiJ8qibw@mail.gmail.com>
<20160623105632.GB19241@fedora-21-dvm>
<CAPg+sBg90FxbEy1smp9mn+djF-N6PdUprtQ7r_kgvKCGbTHndQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20160623113904.GA19686@fedora-21-dvm>
<CAPg+sBiqh80Q4Dfm0y6aEX+gHrcHZMq3tckejx8KDCPb-ikkOg@mail.gmail.com>
<20160623121000.GA20073@fedora-21-dvm>
<CAPg+sBgCkD_54p10NgfDozFo+dNnm-mL1B=NyGYpkdrXgTtxUg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBgCkD_54p10NgfDozFo+dNnm-mL1B=NyGYpkdrXgTtxUg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: 08c91bf2-3940-11e6-bcde-0015176ca198
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdAEUEkAaAgsB AmAbWldeVF57WWU7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUQAWckQE e00eVhpwfgAIeX5x ZkcsXngIVUUoI0Rg
QUdQFXAHZDJmdTJM BBVFdwNVdQJNeEwU a1l3GhFYa3VsNCMk
FAgyOXU9MCtqYAlL TwdFKFUITA4TBDkk QAsPEX0FPHVNSjUv
Iho9K1kaBw4NNQ0Y EGNpAQpHa3c8
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:43:13 -0000
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:16:48PM +0200, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2016 14:10, "Peter Todd" <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
>=20
> > Right, so you accept that we'll exert some degree of editorial control;
> the
> > question now is what editorial policies should we exert?
>=20
> No, I do not. I am saying that some degree of editorial control will
> inevitably exist, simply because there is some human making the choice of
> assigning a BIP number and merging. My opinion is that we should try to
> restrict that editorial control to only be subject to objective process,
> and not be dependent on personal opinions.
>
> > My argument is that rejecting BIP75 is something we should do on
> > ethical/strategic grounds. You may disagree with that, but please don't
> troll
> > and call that "advocating censorship"
>=20
> I think that you are free to express dislike of BIP75. Suggesting to remo=
ve
> it for that reason is utterly ridiculous to me, whatever you want to call
> it.
In the future we're likely to see a lot of BIPs around AML/KYC support, e.g.
adding personal identity information to transactions, blacklist standards, =
etc.
Should we accept those BIPs into the bips repo?
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXa9lVAAoJEGOZARBE6K+yb9oH/iHf9I6IGVxT53QxXsMUHpBA
74bZhAxplMwbQ1jwBFqDfXjXJD4x6FcpHzKSiW+JV0fbICTCbTgoIs6zGb5MQRlH
lK1jWLctctjCEfb4QF2H8L7NP4+ihBLx3FuCPztYYkPthgzlM6SFU8peKHP+DLqk
kMup97wJPVxd/RXi0WVgKxOWco3quQVPdhZgfNbGW0uG9qWjgQ6iTxymYGsUTeOI
hrDbu9WtM7HmhmphIMtQjPyUpkciNFFKO6dgGxzbHtgPgvFOvdHDZHcWG+ONlW4K
A/r2naPl2iz/nNP3ontMsjkeD6GLAaS+qRVbpgwBffB7NbeyZZwQYRliTfiTJ2c=
=S/uQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--
|
