1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <drak@zikula.org>) id 1WCp2l-0000Nv-Bg
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:28:55 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of zikula.org
designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.125.82.51; envelope-from=drak@zikula.org;
helo=mail-wg0-f51.google.com;
Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WCp2k-00011o-JN
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:28:55 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id z12so4105832wgg.30
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:28:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type;
bh=fTMAfnQVTHzRdOQfjjS4ydcH9UZAhJqHPYzdewtpLaQ=;
b=YhjWaxAaTiQA3qh3IoVxnYZ+giup2R9ULwgW1MH4NSFZLNOuefXrgraB0FehMM+GIv
WMO4HzI3W2BOnB5oJclndu+lyuO+1xZKNXNNI2X0hcBOK32vKHxOYK3eG4rvvbQTvBFG
ie5hiI+E2sC8RmtKgKTt82kG8Zb3tC64aTIghU3FPWR92dXnh1h/OcGfxUV8nMcHyoMc
LqrXQa4KDAghU93xmAKzoC53Z1i4jcwfiCAlk7FAsvgmDrUB0h6ACYiD7oOfG2AwwxB/
JM40Le6OVb7tWrK2K0i5B3fd9wVMe/SqJEyoDgsB2I2hIUrjSFFM3VHLl9DuqS1wFFng
bhQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnm1BxoGzWX0lO0I1EM3+m0Uw4IKKoch53KT2GZD7hq4ApUu2MrHuKPcj3SBXhzzUvv8JW1
X-Received: by 10.194.84.144 with SMTP id z16mr21630681wjy.23.1392031728508;
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:28:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.205.69 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:28:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Drak <drak@zikula.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:28:28 +0000
Message-ID: <CANAnSg1LgpHGf-vTV0to1Z7sogf1ic6WTbogEsrQy1wh4C5zfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0102ddaeb1bbe204f20ba454
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1WCp2k-00011o-JN
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] MtGox blames bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:28:55 -0000
--089e0102ddaeb1bbe204f20ba454
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
What is the official response from the Bitcoin Core developers about
MtGox's assertion that their problems are due to a fault of bitcoin, as
opposed to a fault of their own?
The technical analysis preluding this mess, was that MtGox was at fault for
their faulty wallet implementation.
Drak
--089e0102ddaeb1bbe204f20ba454
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">What is the official response from the Bitcoin Core develo=
pers about MtGox's assertion that their problems are due to a fault of =
bitcoin, as opposed to a fault of their own?<div><br></div><div>The technic=
al analysis preluding this mess, was that MtGox was at fault for their faul=
ty wallet implementation.<br>
<div><br></div><div>Drak</div></div></div>
--089e0102ddaeb1bbe204f20ba454--
|
