1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@exmulti.com>) id 1TCQWN-0002Nd-AH
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:41:03 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1TCQWL-0004uD-1Q
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:41:03 +0000
Received: by qadc11 with SMTP id c11so4259016qad.13
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=6dw3L0qTZCrm5ECYTlzPKNUGXSxLpIbyMLK7CUyWKaw=;
b=d7g6PkXCYCA7I7rNvA/S5lKcC9l77CXo7wLHPTUy5JLUjWDskLO7A5KxpbpWgfLesP
cvE62jm/3RkXtSXOjcENsLWfr/BPImR0icyCuCBheuKuqFo/d7uSRkmZWSARhG5fBuWW
8TVhH23S/w2Bzre/n9UWWDOw48ZpL3JJ87n6uhSMVpwwW7aK9U0MSQ/c9uIf3hj2acSt
cT0k4Ht310M7lpDpnRFnMMB9AwsOF1pfVVx7IOsWGZQT1l8hAkj7yWOzNbiGsOo5+oAI
+qBvjdI0K2q/ewdoDKanCk/uWiksKe6YXHlGfoBYpprK//qdFB/3IFCiXhefZ9tIqONK
pHmw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.70.138 with SMTP id d10mr5427387qaj.12.1347608455382; Fri,
14 Sep 2012 00:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.97.6 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [77.221.185.226]
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJChAYSDTV1GTKq+cqygyt1=DRdDsyaPbyNXpTiG51f1cw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANg8-dCUC=qEqBSay5VKdqZOwEnx_UxYrT2LbV+20Vb1FbCJ1A@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+s+GJChAYSDTV1GTKq+cqygyt1=DRdDsyaPbyNXpTiG51f1cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 03:40:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+8xBpeur+VAwaUDSUp64-BtJKxOOzK5vgm6nyfRT41z6e449g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
To: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnHlyrciXGzZNbJMkxDWsVVyCTofZJyZrZ4VO53dyserthVcop7601I497LDYFwPNYaGyYU
X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
1.5 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[77.221.185.226 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
X-Headers-End: 1TCQWL-0004uD-1Q
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] separate out blockchain db and wallet to
two dirs?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:41:03 -0000
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is currently not feasible due to BerkelyDB limitations. All the
> databases are within one 'environment', which is necessarily one directory
> (it can probably be hacked around, but obviously we're really careful).
>
> When LevelDB for the block chain and the custom format for the wallets is
> introduces, various new configurations will be possible: Multiple wallets,
> wallet in block chain in separate dirs, etc.
Indeed. See many threads on the forum discussing this... a
frequently requested feature.
As Wladimir says, it's a database constraint at the moment.
--
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik@exmulti.com
|
