1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
|
Return-Path: <mark@friedenbach.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44238AE7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:58:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pl0-f50.google.com (mail-pl0-f50.google.com
[209.85.160.50])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F2F403
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:58:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pl0-f50.google.com with SMTP id o2so7790330plk.12
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:58:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=friedenbach-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=uShZfC6DRxk1UUHzAYMaolPHCQmQUfQw3WrcC9jsc0s=;
b=cc2s82wbBEA+VJ5HrpB4jeJE8/E/ZxUIYR4rWaiGiXdwITegkuPIynKwIiF94y4UST
RL37u0E/NhLe/Q9sHGHNX3mY0laRf2DdjbYcGSD1hTkx+BRkqC1yRNm0QtmFnqHrgdKG
w4yQuflwtOSXgEIuL2cCtTfIp86PDWeyEJr8wTnYa/Pw6ODzD579RvnJ/KDkkEsvetMC
9ENo/y/zJO41JclzMr4rLFhbOZN3qHGiQvETusuLbYHU387Jpg2zL6n48UGRpGNYORTM
7rsTq6GTDU2N8aP+z90dOEFCEcEWLgZbzNaALfe6/XEWm/CBINN6ElqYrCDEOW/FO8d7
G8iQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=uShZfC6DRxk1UUHzAYMaolPHCQmQUfQw3WrcC9jsc0s=;
b=ZqEXL4g/fKkawFlDMkfZY9L7kT6yefoQl6Mc7fR7t+iT5yYHyZCOgM21pUkA0llQfY
dPn+08tLWcKgr4MkPqeCM07giB1ea2xE/kY3rWWQf76736Ez1ztYhFItTLaDXm3GPBE+
/fw+qSANpFMtuoqq8HuetM1Ly/3nUtvUmnbEKEFsxNsMwEtCcGczMti42cYvZ2gXcYWx
Ra3L223X5aQ3WJdlE8HxphhI545FzwAAANTMCZoH39ZiOtiB67KVj+xN28UqNhRDTRXx
XJUxmUTiXKn+PxjKr6oUbb4jg7WEaY0YjXLvKpXnOh++BUvlc5sxFmUlt3SuPewy3uBp
WSgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKXDiR5CVqsyfNXc8suiNDWL1IAJKGBoAaayVclq2pWleGpZfM/
W/1nZV3KH2JoLDlwmNvTbsKEPQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosbrIQxcGl/ff4q9Ez/p1QJet5GTDTqX8Bg3o2S7CSWpElNjFoKKKxG/Ox98Ln3GS6brhrhrg==
X-Received: by 10.84.248.145 with SMTP id q17mr4481123pll.416.1513720722411;
Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4600:9c66:89b6:c1d2:56a8:6dd9?
([2601:647:4600:9c66:89b6:c1d2:56a8:6dd9])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
m11sm28367737pfh.35.2017.12.19.13.58.41
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:58:41 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
In-Reply-To: <52b65bab-ff84-7e21-e35a-f6ebd8106767@satoshilabs.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:58:40 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <725C679B-60E2-4E21-9F7D-10F67118D58D@friedenbach.org>
References: <CAAUFj10gEPBS3nTZ6aJn4UazhcJKPni6_pYGWwOs+QNeDo9NaA@mail.gmail.com>
<52b65bab-ff84-7e21-e35a-f6ebd8106767@satoshilabs.com>
To: Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Sign / Verify message against SegWit P2SH
addresses.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:58:45 -0000
For what it=E2=80=99s worth, I think it would be quite easy to do better =
than the implied solution of rejiggering the message signing system to =
support non-P2PKH scripts. Instead, have the signature be an actual =
bitcoin transaction with inputs that have the script being signed. Use =
the salted hash of the message being signed as the FORKID as if this =
were a spin-off with replay protection. This accomplishes three things:
(1) This enables signing by any infrastructure out there =E2=80=94 =
including hardware wallets and 2FA signing services =E2=80=94 that have =
enabled support for FORKID signing, which is a wide swath of the =
ecosystem because of Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold.
(2) It generalizes the message signing to allow multi-party signing =
setups as complicated (via sighash, etc.) as those bitcoin transactions =
allow, using existing and future tools based on Partially Signed Bitcoin =
Transactions; and
(3) It unifies a single approach for message signing, proof of reserve =
(where the inputs are actual UTXOs), and off-chain colored coins.
There=E2=80=99s the issue of size efficiency, but for the single-party =
message signing application that can be handled by a BIP that specifies =
a template for constructing the pseudo-transaction and its inputs from a =
raw script.
Mark
> On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:36 PM, Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev =
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> On 08/12/17 19:25, Dan Bryant via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> I know there are posts, and an issue opened against it, but is there
>> anyone writing a BIP for Sign / Verify message against a SegWit =
address?
>=20
> Dan, are you still planning to write this BIP?
>=20
> --=20
> Best Regards / S pozdravom,
>=20
> Pavol "stick" Rusnak
> CTO, SatoshiLabs
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
