summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/e9/c332fbeb845126d495ccc5a04d929cda469acb
blob: e7d92b0cd33ebaf4f86bdf0a811de8b563dd2857 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB6227A4
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  3 Jul 2017 02:28:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f178.google.com (mail-ua0-f178.google.com
	[209.85.217.178])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D812417E
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  3 Jul 2017 02:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w19so80893546uac.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 02 Jul 2017 19:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
	:subject:to:cc;
	bh=wNQZVq0IXkjSU2oLKNcTy/NFwqY8cWWytOLy0q0b+7M=;
	b=R1o1i/G9YQzivIEOO7mVe/lkaUZUgxuPCjvAr7tmzD2t1Dusui8KVqSkug6J1PH4Ii
	oxB1wFBe9UxrX4R46a9KSZj/oV8ZypzIOoHRmBUoCV58pI2j5cNq137ari0r/Qwzi0a1
	00392W2+/ci8Dfhe9gy5oha/N5UF6bV9UbGF9AUhz0+gNHOS8qX1jaJpp1DHDiGB0FzB
	yfGDgnZKTZsuVHAy6cPX3zN6qP9eLJ76NLL2BzghOtpkhbJVlRBdiIgjkBFlZcQxTLem
	O/weDjw9zNWchufNchtT7pUc2Ebftx9icd1wrFpOVhIHeR+7PCbIFX1OC1KoXXYjfBFl
	6ioA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
	:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=wNQZVq0IXkjSU2oLKNcTy/NFwqY8cWWytOLy0q0b+7M=;
	b=UIDo6tJeNADLPWBwddQkBfNJ911HpBmf7aW8eQyGXXECiQJQ6RphrmHrn974L+ffBr
	dNF+En2Re1sKZlBhFGWmYNncYuAQb00P2OLvCP2tpt/xQyH8+tVn/yjQJxo2Z50W3hjK
	zNmtZgf1ajVJlJUKnnVPIMc46+WQwgBjhjZCnkG6fYdOYymE5P/tnncrfvCmZOsjl7Dr
	pLneQgp4L5YVqtekZKo76HYtuitfvssIjP4w8AHjgVpUKAp0swAktEf0xaK49NattlAJ
	xNPoIM7BsFjrpAuLn4QG/u3VVMLnqRkFL3kh+74MYBW1Mwj8TDBxQqQDFgZP5dMGaOrR
	MFlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwnnCT+jhaum3fiaTbTpikpHYkdOZj/hjgh2YHKOuWm/kGhRLYx
	vdigUu50Kn0QHXvWN/W1ZpHGkAuucA==
X-Received: by 10.176.67.98 with SMTP id k89mr20076389uak.103.1499048916091;
	Sun, 02 Jul 2017 19:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.40.2 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jul 2017 19:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <i0RP2rjFVA8h3PMYT7lbELniTxCKKpcjayO9cRygp2qVyURqIbGPMXvJ1RVjgsJIRU9HcE4-ud2Vt5d8qYWGKfDxE1jeFtbRMSim5Mis-6c=@protonmail.com>
References: <uupN1N30M_M_-fb7bBfHgn2XnpTpRNWCP3BpFiHXDHQiWqUf4u3POgd58tpDZS5fQjSst59JaxFdIRb7qt9Hb8V9QHHKqe0YBAW0XnRBqiw=@protonmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgQGDFOm+vmPuJJU2=hpdZE6KC5WPzY6utvFk_g5wPQ58g@mail.gmail.com>
	<i0RP2rjFVA8h3PMYT7lbELniTxCKKpcjayO9cRygp2qVyURqIbGPMXvJ1RVjgsJIRU9HcE4-ud2Vt5d8qYWGKfDxE1jeFtbRMSim5Mis-6c=@protonmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 02:28:34 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: gIiiKT1QQyyOLsmau9NozqNKE9U
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgTwYJ+paz5k8HP5Y0jz3_9a9sjApyUsYpZEmrYea5VhpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rhavar <rhavar@protonmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: No chaining off replaceable
	transactions
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 02:28:38 -0000

On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Rhavar <rhavar@protonmail.com> wrote:
> That's not really realistic. In practice some receivers do big sweeps and
> include unconfirmed inputs. Replacing the transaction means you need to pay
> the cost of the sweep, which you probably don't want to do (can be in the
> order of $100s of dollars).

Perhaps I am not following what you're saying here.

If the receiver is paying a higher feerate than your replacement,
he'll get it confirmed as fast or faster than your replacement in any
case.