1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
Return-Path: <achow101@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 070A08A5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:39:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f53.google.com (mail-vk0-f53.google.com
[209.85.213.53])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 879F310E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:39:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vkd66 with SMTP id 66so37494735vkd.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=kcq9ZtfMvvHtxb0BXM/qoQam3hHRY459uBpWdEfIkRs=;
b=W5xGvV9u42EcqMg1pU0evjVerJ7a8FaCIFcBQPJTCPLN9qyDLBySqNxib6IL5Xi+Xs
turCfdd6LciKydJPwEbCrRBbd+Jdf0OxbgwfqL1zmUEIDj6UBZw13JWMapGL8SX4LMS+
P4Qfvw3x++7Y6unkXZKgj8HoqjYhZyGN/vBQvLvF0Xw2OMhpRzQBcCOV77frS3y2quR+
mAJzSnm+QbmzzY23pFk+dhXr0MfknPAeKo1cTZ9JYFfSh7WAhNlRNaJYvJCNWf45g24g
P0raSoV4ZkHkiUxOvOZ9nMl7brR7Srq/b5ultGY+/vLZGlZO9W4HZM1vsg/zJSqFxjdY
60OQ==
X-Received: by 10.52.164.109 with SMTP id yp13mr12884472vdb.30.1440200348557;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Andrew C <achow101@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:38:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CADToNK93kmXjwSAxj3WcPSYgq2uReVNJSpX1a5M7DMzgjgv5vA@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c296782e68e9051ddac6a2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Questiosn about BIP100
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:39:10 -0000
--001a11c296782e68e9051ddac6a2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi all,
Is there any client or code that currently implements BIP 100? And how will
it be deployed? WIll the initial fork be deployed in the same manner that
the max block size changes are deployed described in the bip?
Thanks
--001a11c296782e68e9051ddac6a2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi all,<div><br></div><div>Is there any client or code tha=
t currently implements BIP 100? And how will it be deployed? WIll the initi=
al fork be deployed in the same manner that the max block size changes are =
deployed described in the bip?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div></div>
--001a11c296782e68e9051ddac6a2--
|
