1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <kanzure@gmail.com>) id 1Xh4VM-00008r-TX
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:35:44 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.214.169; envelope-from=kanzure@gmail.com;
helo=mail-ob0-f169.google.com;
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Xh4VL-0001tx-LC
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:35:44 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m8so3739898obr.14
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.129.226 with SMTP id nz2mr745338obb.5.1414017338106;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.101.197 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADK=3HwNp9bMtpviZK0cyYc+UTEvm5589Obe5of7VbMZ06dJ4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALqxMTHeipZZrJ_NSXK9vxiO83gSDgM6TA7T7XNBS3LtmuK2KA@mail.gmail.com>
<CADK=3HwNp9bMtpviZK0cyYc+UTEvm5589Obe5of7VbMZ06dJ4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:35:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CABaSBawmfP0m98jM_5qyHEoJmVK_UeBsc=Odf5QMb0Nw-pAp3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail.com>, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(kanzure[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Xh4VL-0001tx-LC
Cc: Bitcoin-Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] side-chains & 2-way pegging (Re: is there
a way to do bitcoin-staging?)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:35:45 -0000
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail.com> wrote:
> p.s. I'm not trying to monetize this site. I just tried to make
> something I thought could be useful.
[Unsolicited administrivia follows.]
You have been posting this in a bunch of places for a while now, at
least three times today by my count on other mediums. I also observed
negative karma scores associated with these posts. Maybe you could
consider toning down the message frequency? I think by now everyone
knows you want them to use your site. I also think that in the limit
that it would be inappropriate for /everyone/ to post all possible
research sites, or even vaguely topical discussion sites, for every
paper posted. Personally, I would much rather have discussions happen
on the mailing list anyway, although if I had a different opinion I
certainly hope I would still send this message.
Thank you.
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
|
