1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
|
Return-Path: <tomz@freedommail.ch>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF2BBA2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:39:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mx-out01.mykolab.com (mx.kolabnow.com [95.128.36.1])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E02224
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:39:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kolabnow.com
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mx04.mykolab.com (mx04.mykolab.com [10.20.7.102])
by mx-out01.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D775F65CC5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:38:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Tom Zander <tomz@freedommail.ch>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:38:55 +0200
Message-ID: <1536368.e5g6sdTPab@strawberry>
In-Reply-To: <4FDEA4E2-F96D-4A2B-BE6C-04808CFEC74B@jonasschnelli.ch>
References: <CAO3Pvs8ccTkgrecJG6KFbBW+9moHF-FTU+4qNfayeE3hM9uRrg@mail.gmail.com>
<2778650.T23JsbTI1Y@strawberry>
<4FDEA4E2-F96D-4A2B-BE6C-04808CFEC74B@jonasschnelli.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 17:18:35 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Compact Client Side Filtering for
Light Clients
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:39:01 -0000
On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:30:18 CEST Jonas Schnelli wrote:
> I personally would ALWAYS [snip]
I mentioned that it was a usability point for a reason, and your personal=20
behavior makes me want to quote one of the main UX guidelines;=20
=E2=80=9CYou are not your user=E2=80=9D
http://uxmyths.com/post/715988395/myth-you-are-like-your-users
older;
http://52weeksofux.com/post/385981879/you-are-not-your-user
I think we should defer to actual real numbers and user reseach, as has bee=
n=20
quoted by Andreas. You disagreeing based on your own experience and behavio=
r=20
is worse than useless. As the above links show.
Don=E2=80=99t fall in that trap :)
=2D-=20
Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
|
