1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C4534A2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:27:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com (mail-oi0-f53.google.com
[209.85.218.53])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2A8B1F5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:27:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by oibn4 with SMTP id n4so155248434oib.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=th6GgSRuUkMJYRXEWtqIRYX5ptkfYHjCDkFDzx89+QA=;
b=bwSx5lcpLvvfMX75OwbO/+gj6oNJhJhbF+e3m5/vHpauYv+msJ3JZ6fbOcEBf/2Cpt
6f1w5ptrCzPkgxGXYLjGtIC8/41eHXlqLY5wilrmcgGmaZRovFEn363KRRlMJQBs1kmZ
LOsEBV6WyHwszrKCz8EJ73wvc4lsky61Mv/YxETE3Alq+txjwx7JI9EjgNTXUsTBN8kr
0p9646REJAkhC/V8m5S59ehd/JBc/vJzAHH08kMm60RFCQVdKTGSPqMSUOyHut3+EFlv
WrHKxpLOt/zh3O+bRKGQ0iyxiFD4iGaEBJWc3ZipgQiIt08BqEwrXptyUb/kSxFNX2r3
wI6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl5ZzUHodDX7KCchF9G87aucI/0azksABO0zFwwyr8NNpvfnG1tXkYjxg4cLRnkDSYzycHx
X-Received: by 10.202.46.209 with SMTP id u200mr4701016oiu.66.1437611241766;
Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.100.1.239] ([204.58.254.99])
by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
fh3sm1848893obb.23.2015.07.22.17.27.20
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CAPg+sBgs-ouEMu=LOVCmOyCGwfM1Ygxooz0shyvAuHDGGZYfJw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBgugLSVEwDLXhgey86_rM2fTjGWXFuXsiZioJKCZiHiNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Message-ID: <55B034DD.2020802@thinlink.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:27:09 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBgugLSVEwDLXhgey86_rM2fTjGWXFuXsiZioJKCZiHiNg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core and hard forks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:27:23 -0000
On 7/22/2015 9:52 AM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> It would be irresponsible and dangerous to the network and thus the
> users of the software to risk forks, or to take a leading role in
> pushing dramatic changes.
Count me among those who see allowing bitcoin to become
space-constrained, without technical reason, as a dramatic change.
Especially when the reasons cited in support are
- Various species of vaporware
- Amateurish economic thinking surrounding fees
- "We don't support it because not everyone supports it because we
don't support it because ..." infinite descent
|