1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
|
Return-Path: <ali@notatether.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDA1C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:54:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4CA41C56
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:54:22 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 7A4CA41C56
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=notatether.com header.i=@notatether.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=protonmail header.b=TQRqmovg
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id S5AhizaI9LNO
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:54:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 8869341C4F
Received: from mail-4323.proton.ch (mail-4323.proton.ch [185.70.43.23])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8869341C4F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:54:20 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 17:54:02 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=notatether.com;
s=protonmail; t=1659635657; x=1659894857;
bh=Ub5aOSfqvXC6viqDDw5hTWt4jls66hhK/fp+DuFgEi8=;
h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:
References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:
Feedback-ID:Message-ID;
b=TQRqmovgaiL3M/nMzlFZlb36blchfUOCyIL4DhpaXVJ0xowXfwo5A5y7wBgnMlIe8
Se3y3PCBIYJm+LL+cU6s5sFH31a6YKh/ku09mMahtva65q64dYhYgwq9hNrqr9OB6Y
Smumf7O4ejl/cvETmckqmoGOJDzdUBHkIFYC2oixLsFJQj/QbpR2QjTXQTBkmdWtJJ
MGlBK7e+KFgxedN5ZC0ciLrTgzWYlfINGbaq786QFmno9HzVp90+rByk3NRDQPD6YA
kRyuW3LkDfS/r4yTtlR2DMIVeW+5RXBxYb38dnC4P3GAOEhKnHk/x+VT8eIUh125z6
U1k3u8VzIGW5g==
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
From: Ali Sherief <ali@notatether.com>
Reply-To: Ali Sherief <ali@notatether.com>
Message-ID: <92xA8EvymL-T7scNgL9H7o7QMDO7P0q8yEl8aPk4v3KpdXiPUr4-h22-RskqnLTiQE_hD0BEvpLZFMTysTy9laszpC9t6PJDR5jBUQy_J8U=@notatether.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220804121851.7e4zoqxaaolseazn@artanis>
References: <4Lz70s3l79z4x2h7@mail-41103.protonmail.ch>
<20220804121851.7e4zoqxaaolseazn@artanis>
Feedback-ID: 34210769:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:06:02 +0000
Cc: "luke_bipeditor@dashjr.org" <luke_bipeditor@dashjr.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-notatether-signedmessage
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 17:54:22 -0000
My sincere apologies, the link returns a 404 (trailing dot). The correct li=
nk to the BIP is https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/bips/blob/master/bip-notate=
ther-signedmessage.mediawiki
-Ali
------- Original Message -------
On Thursday, August 4th, 2022 at 3:18 PM, Ali Sherief <ali@notatether.com> =
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a new BIP, called notatether-signedmessage. It can be view=
ed at https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/bips/blob/master/bip-notatether-signed=
message.mediawiki.
>
> For those who want a quick summary, it defines a step-by-step process for=
signing and verifying messages from legacy, native/nested segwit, and tapr=
oot addresses. It does not define a new signature format itself, except in =
the case of Taproot. For those addresses, I have defined a signature format=
that has 1 byte header/recID, 64 bytes signature, and 32 bytes x coordinat=
e of a public key. This is required to run the BIP340 Schnorr verify algori=
thm using only the signature - and the header byte is added for backwards c=
ompatibility. Otherwise, it completely integrates BIP137 signatures.
>
> I am planning to move that format to its own BIP as soon as possible, in =
lieu that it is unacceptable to define formats in an Informational BIP.
>
> Please leave your comments in this mailing list. CC'ing BIP editors.
>
> - Ali
|
