1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77C0AAA6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 22:34:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f169.google.com (mail-ua0-f169.google.com
[209.85.217.169])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D7723D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 22:34:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f169.google.com with SMTP id j53so82375455uaa.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=ZcEFTAD3YDSt0L9JX8qI7xWrFWqkiHgmi/09Tkhr6yY=;
b=f6Yag6jXtegbkrDwnmeNjvplPb7OLz5+GPVyXVRNWj6fEzPOh5rSuST/gvIbb0srMH
AGzJrbPv4J0a8Qo98+u69XpLZw6FhyethfMB6VbyD4BHkIng/lLkuqf5rSffMvoVGBx4
4YcwNWWBLR7Lf4Z0CXvzggt+YadhDFCZXCuXKUcGshjkUzOFrCucmPq5W9Puf3bNSZwH
Xhfgm3aPOgfHZU+NuJfTr6SIQmJjPd8UGn5G3nuUn3IVo58BYSgA+ITnaQdSFIUvQEoZ
RAGehVwpQ9Awxi+IOsG+CR0FS967wiF/6tjzVVqdowM0KyMvxbrdO6B+kVBuDbjyabBT
YdEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=ZcEFTAD3YDSt0L9JX8qI7xWrFWqkiHgmi/09Tkhr6yY=;
b=niTbbyRoesfj9XKsD21MR9ryyAr1HkBlWnLEKUtteA82vmLwCl+TjCpy9j17spPUcL
GnRNKKoIoJQs/Ad5fPES+yAJnX+Ehkz/9DXSX6EMePUXM3QnONt87Lr0rOSyqvpMIK45
h36eMPPJiS5d5cVTOzR11XKrv8gkxbN8wckqJCRLL5zPQG0M3QV4cAA9tkIk1S/TKWLf
SArMCn7sDDnjtjtL+zi7FtfZsoVZm78qCM9ne/WH638DHNG6YF3tKNRV4DRuw2xOaQUu
Y4gf4tZFPvr2lqIwyAb/qDbp8Eks4yY/IUxBnSZtYL0xLV+YDLudOXkn6tuSlcMi9ePh
1wNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwbKlNVur79NcpdvQ8nGf83iKrJMBamDOSSQoV0l70v1N7DYRGT
c4Ain4LzfOOEIUzoPp74HWx58b7k1A==
X-Received: by 10.176.67.98 with SMTP id k89mr4515995uak.103.1497998070235;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.13.7 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFMkqK_73RrpaS2oJQ-0o6oC29m6a1h411_P7HmVcAyX712Sgw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJowKgLtu-HUDuakk4DDU53nyChbQk_zY=f5OO2j1Za95PdL7w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSZ_X3G7j3-S6tAGPe2TOTT2umBB8a0RHpD-wAHN9aPgw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFMkqK_73RrpaS2oJQ-0o6oC29m6a1h411_P7HmVcAyX712Sgw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 22:34:29 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ji9i-wMmj_ctkNTNQTJX4eCXxxY
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQKrFCTL-=qREOjNrwjDqhgdPZQUSgpXHUKyG4+NAo26g@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Hampus_Sj=C3=B6berg?= <hampus.sjoberg@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Miners forced to run non-core code in order to
get segwit activated
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 22:34:31 -0000
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Hampus Sj=C3=B6berg
<hampus.sjoberg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Segwit2x/BIP91/BIP148 will orphan miners that do not run a Segwit2x (or
> BIP148) node, because they wouldn't have the new consensus rule of requir=
ing
> all blocks to signal for segwit.
All versions of Bitcoin Core since 0.13.1 signal segwit, 0.14.1+ even
when downstream mining software doesn't support it.
I think it would be useful for there to exist a useful and trivial
patch against current (0.14.2) software to engage in the BIP91-like
orphaning, like people have provided for BIP148-- but right now I
don't see any specification of the behavior so it's unclear to me
_exactly_ what it would need to implement to be consistent.
|
