1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1WIJKP-00018E-8l
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:49:49 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.148.154 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.148.154; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail148154.authsmtp.co.uk;
Received: from outmail148154.authsmtp.co.uk ([62.13.148.154])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1WIJKO-0007ks-1d for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:49:49 +0000
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s1PEnfwO039642;
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:49:41 GMT
Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s1PEnVLW090144
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:49:35 GMT
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:49:22 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Message-ID: <20140225144922.GA25549@savin>
References: <20140225044116.GA28050@savin>
<f35865264f37315d580a30dc49789a5a.squirrel@fulvetta.riseup.net>
<CANEZrP1wB9zpnD+DOnmCNycEGB+nZMt8gQrjpn5V92MMkausaA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1wB9zpnD+DOnmCNycEGB+nZMt8gQrjpn5V92MMkausaA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 0b6186aa-9e2c-11e3-94fa-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdAcUHlAWAgsB AmIbWlBeVFR7WmY7 bAxPbAVDY01GQQRq
WVdMSlVNFUsrAHx0 WHhiNRl7dwRCfDBx ZURqXj5bDkJ7fUAs
E1NdQG9VeGZhPWMC WUQOJh5UcAFPdx8U a1N6AHBDAzANdhES
HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA4lEzN0 SwoFBV0A
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1WIJKO-0007ks-1d
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fee drop
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:49:49 -0000
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 06:25:18PM +0530, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Given that the fee drop puts fees in "real" (i.e. dollar) terms back to
> where they were some months ago, it seems odd to claim this is creating
> vulnerabilities that didn't exist in the previous version. The cost of an
> attack would be the same as before.
No it's not. The cost is only incurred in the transactions actually get
mined, and unlike before the drop appears to be well under the
break-even orphan cost of transactions; we've got no reason to think the
clearance rate of these low-fee transactions will be significant.
But anyway, mostly I'm writing this to register my strong opposition
knowing full well that I don't expect it to change your minds.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000eb671d932a8d310e8ab963c53b2be8a27bd5de2a712c2f59
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)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==
=aJh0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--
|
