1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
|
Return-Path: <user@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5607CD57
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:02:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148109.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail148109.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.148.109])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AF0C7DE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:02:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c245.authsmtp.com (mail-c245.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.245])
by punt21.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w7UK2khx027733;
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 21:02:46 +0100 (BST)
(envelope-from user@petertodd.org)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w7UK2iOQ098232
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 21:02:45 +0100 (BST)
(envelope-from user@petertodd.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B6BC40094;
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:02:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B0EBA210FB; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 16:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 16:02:39 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: shiva sitamraju <shiva@blockonomics.co>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20180830200239.ujuzh7pitcuatdt3@petertodd.org>
References: <CABuOfuh7M6siJW1FzXajsBSeYSu=TBEgx9SAmCbwnP=yb7rJOQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ouokm2htlc7qu47f"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABuOfuh7M6siJW1FzXajsBSeYSu=TBEgx9SAmCbwnP=yb7rJOQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Server-Quench: a98a629c-ac8f-11e8-8e1a-9cb654bb2504
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZIVwkA IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdQIUGUATAgsB Am4bWVVeUF97XWY7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUwINeh5Y eX8eWxFwdAcIfXp0 ZwgzV3gKWkZzJlss
EUYCCGwHMG99YDUe AV1RJFFSdQcYLB1A alQxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXFClO XgcAMQlae0sGBSJU
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1039:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:29:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testnet3 Reest
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:02:53 -0000
--ouokm2htlc7qu47f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:58:42PM +0530, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev w=
rote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Testnet is now 1411795 blocks and a full sync is taking atleast 48 hours.
>=20
> Is a testnet reset scheduled in the next release or any reason not to do a
> reset ?
>=20
> Fast onboarding/lower disk overheads would be very much appreicated for
> testing purposes
Actually I'd advocate the opposite: I'd want testnet to be a *larger*
blockchain than mainnet to find size-related issues first.
Note that for testing regtest is often a better alternative, and you can se=
tup
private regtest blockchains fairly easily and with good control over exactly
when and how blocks are created.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--ouokm2htlc7qu47f
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Nkkf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ouokm2htlc7qu47f--
|
