1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
|
Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 18:15:53 -0700
Received: from mail-oo1-f55.google.com ([209.85.161.55])
by mail.fairlystable.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
(Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from <bitcoindev+bncBCL7RHHJZYJBBP7CWHBQMGQET3MX4ZA@googlegroups.com>)
id 1uYww4-0004Fj-PB
for bitcoindev@gnusha.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2025 18:15:53 -0700
Received: by mail-oo1-f55.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-60f430ab80esf3463209eaf.0
for <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>; Mon, 07 Jul 2025 18:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1751937346; cv=pass;
d=google.com; s=arc-20240605;
b=kVFz2RMoHgY0TrNBA58s8NjiSRRdpEBkwmLBdD8eSb0FD9tHZ8aOg4WDfsCOmYlucL
CcTOWCrzGmFWmxyo9oCGSzubtu4xY2UMNZmKdUIVlCAU5FMsFO1W/Hl/aJapf7+a98eC
1Un+dQTcD/HDJcZ485v/Bx73JfnZiP1ZNxwt+bBlylRHWC6lU5JvmK4IVcJx9u/um61x
V1vkwak9gTamZA1ykptnvAE3MU/Uw91m3d5ukZLBH8uRAfZZ8uTzviHs5rRIxHakHdTQ
WmFzmBjcYaiijWGqQ04HSVN2KIj1IqZBgV/HDBUJ3QdaD6rmkKYqBmInTnzqSErLGrqh
ksiQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605;
h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post
:list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to:mime-version:feedback-id
:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:from:to:date
:dkim-signature;
bh=dRszU/z94E5eJ8zyXyZ51Itur79FCFdOdt8dAf0Y8Mc=;
fh=JzgvIcrVWIOAVtWUVioKbjZKWun0eihl7OqgtsQd/YQ=;
b=YJxVgkz6TUAcogxYAxitJMZ6zr4GnlUAQER0fk6dsvz07VXEplhKRdVJF+YhgbLTlV
b4ZhpcNlpdsO4830kPyr/F7Ta91q6xPLMtfLBzkRLQKVobdPMV1FrLdNimzaxIZoniCb
vT2ItYL+5r2YVfI+kYsH7vC+8TfPSgTvVI5A/ee+GUesDR994qrCCzERnikqR0qKiiRY
+csbI5yPZ+5T0k0gOxiuhv+RHoWBc6/nFaMfD5EI3kBhhTpJ866Z9n/16IJ1hQ76GktA
exbF9ZRjpPsT8a5SrGPIqipycFjdJsWY1MjsU2pQ6vJ9dQ/xWy/C0NmCRFSpSupi2w0s
e4gg==;
darn=gnusha.org
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; gmr-mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@proton.me header.s=protonmail header.b=Y5pQlo8r;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of conduition@proton.me designates 79.135.106.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=conduition@proton.me;
dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=proton.me
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlegroups.com; s=20230601; t=1751937346; x=1752542146; darn=gnusha.org;
h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post
:list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to
:x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:mime-version
:feedback-id:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:from:to
:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=dRszU/z94E5eJ8zyXyZ51Itur79FCFdOdt8dAf0Y8Mc=;
b=Q6EAuAkuOGq8gmkW3zIYzfXIYg0U3Qi7mMLqSg524BgP3xfqbAf/xpHaMHmt/QUdY0
y9XHDw9l3VUzqN93/UYbc65gRMAXSotrl6Y6Xd+kiEfvSIyaX9LqhqIh8N5aZFCyTMkj
XT9xcti4wCVo6sWF62McsTWrASBuIAFz2kTi/PuFEmTq7Z11zn0x3I+FxeTovFEZABYR
sgjXQ8hhata1krih9HuCypWo5u0MCMnuU4StHpHlE9xAnEBAUlraOzNT5pRKG79hEisU
beQBJn3nEKdwZe3E7/GWWacwL9UToIB6O/PS9jtfvaMeyLJ0/QPTRmxQc6WSAIM7JUpl
1TGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1751937346; x=1752542146;
h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post
:list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to
:x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:mime-version
:feedback-id:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:from:to
:date:x-beenthere:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=dRszU/z94E5eJ8zyXyZ51Itur79FCFdOdt8dAf0Y8Mc=;
b=i/s1nydh1tzMQWuz8nvRCi7EdPxrO7mqEGKH6yvVtGIg08EAS1TKzPQTwEqdBZI/gh
uulITYW8CmcOTAp1NoCD2ptni5yL2eB2IXnE99VASATi/8owGHYdJ9kokgq0JuG4jNFJ
7ThVmLIuqHLnqZ4gJywv9UvUWL+nxEAMOQZq1P0m2x0ANeNhhf5vvelm6SUksMd1unrD
G1jsHO0dS+9bAO2nzdHidCbUbd/yj2trgEjy0HY8p/cPGO7hxdVQPUV0ALYWHv3tB1Li
12jttua6mKUpkwFPPh/peEpHy0GeBAbiQOr+nFJYSZQz2jN+hSsAfXDu5ULNFP37UQhv
1caw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUCbFvMw1wRB6dwngX+h3xKFioFZuP1k4ja5syij8FozQrO/uEFMfa2xOcvA83o2ouOP0tUdoLVAmv2@gnusha.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxU8F6baCfweQksXvudc33RFPHnrkB6syMjg/ITOlFt2XvTRbe+
WyfGEnafbD3Kt+6o7BmsnrLWTGHL7TKoOr8et0zfQBy03D2W7Fix1Ekq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFp+l4mdMXsmcuvzsSBLt3cU/sPH+NBZrOSjx9HrFZX6wDynQyd0jZqb7MUQ8IeJd8L7EQiWw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:3a0e:b0:407:9a0a:3f54 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-411493890acmr717311b6e.14.1751937346548;
Mon, 07 Jul 2025 18:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com; h=AZMbMZdwzG/kNSLreqUtf2nDnX4gGAd+Os54cCc+dwf78njuvQ==
Received: by 2002:a05:6870:219d:b0:2da:80e4:fad4 with SMTP id
586e51a60fabf-2f79b748155ls1553477fac.2.-pod-prod-00-us; Mon, 07 Jul 2025
18:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:80af:b0:40b:a4ca:f7cb with SMTP id 5614622812f47-4114edb0ab0mr594362b6e.15.1751937343763;
Mon, 07 Jul 2025 18:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 2002:ab3:145:0:b0:2b1:97ca:fe9d with SMTP id a1c4a302cd1d6-2b8ea2340e7msc7a;
Mon, 7 Jul 2025 17:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:20db:20b0:32c:4306:5a7b with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-32e5f568d5dmr27135141fa.6.1751935772962;
Mon, 07 Jul 2025 17:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1751935772; cv=none;
d=google.com; s=arc-20240605;
b=ecDfjrpex42Dq6/sR3Ir9irUl1/UIPkUGjqR/SP1SQj4HXzDQGC0ds8cY45CgK+oZo
eEfBNNUCqkabGuNcdQ8srpXE+GMe+RK96qmrVNYTVJcu31IqkxcLMzjfWxEgPixBfshy
Ax0GWYSW5KlG34pZmv8jStQqMLTZb9tXCI5cN18e7ikNlaNm5l3ai1yuONKfQ7ih0hdl
IMt/anTLf4ISntLqZvM6aBhNPzb8Q/AsWVnP6EbUnoGlRtfhSlbfn/dGFJOOw1YC/Yvo
jfsICUb5qt2TWmrwzoG5ZbSCoD+X2lTnBeKKR9cUs/hMh4XcjH1wPIK4Kj9vbz4KXAO3
Afbw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605;
h=mime-version:feedback-id:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject
:cc:from:to:date:dkim-signature;
bh=86C+74wop1L03rPykCbW77bk9Dc0e6JQoIHXi2sqdSE=;
fh=MjdRPwMMqTCvqsS0x8/KiUP5ScpwSKUUuPzaYsRCcYc=;
b=fGaSDPF1HBTJBIrhUIun0+XbLUvZMB8tBVPSlJzI2S881y+DihMnmO6+omtwuN6yqV
V9oVBc/BV7TsEJOcjfo3Kq1vH6m9FeX+xeHihDACGSlk0u7+nKxR/O6uNUlvzcArfVdO
mmOtfOYTkxvil0Lgm3xYu9igdHTnmFcGlGc9pUaXWbneD0ora+UEEhyiMmPkihOtEzEJ
rnhnYGdlej7l5EOSWBO5Bmjgm6cJZyq/a13FbEELVMf4Q+q+f12N7oc+AWPkRL1AW3k4
XCv0gqC7ceTlSRJMgAzHMXkc7vfqZmgyo8TtQX1RbeGB9e4vKFaPtMgFd+V9X0zm6hnu
wLfg==;
dara=google.com
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@proton.me header.s=protonmail header.b=Y5pQlo8r;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of conduition@proton.me designates 79.135.106.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=conduition@proton.me;
dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=proton.me
Received: from mail-10629.protonmail.ch (mail-10629.protonmail.ch. [79.135.106.29])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 38308e7fff4ca-32e1b002c69si2065491fa.2.2025.07.07.17.49.32
for <bitcoindev@googlegroups.com>
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Mon, 07 Jul 2025 17:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of conduition@proton.me designates 79.135.106.29 as permitted sender) client-ip=79.135.106.29;
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:49:27 +0000
To: Jonas Nick <jonasd.nick@gmail.com>
From: "'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List" <bitcoindev@googlegroups.com>
Cc: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CAT Enables Winternitz Signatures
Message-ID: <Um1180WhyfREJS4CHTfTCzAuDywzNlFlsaIFFwLEGcETcwKCDuJMgSwSs4idfqgCDqtMTuc4FUmcTHWnK2z_tzxw8bdVD9zDiGTCfdbJFjs=@proton.me>
In-Reply-To: <c2abfd68-f118-4951-ba4a-499fc819332f@gmail.com>
References: <uCSokD_EM3XBQBiVIEeju5mPOy2OU-TTAQaavyo0Zs8s2GhAdokhJXLFpcBpG9cKF03dNZfq2kqO-PpxXouSIHsDosjYhdBGkFArC5yIHU0=@proton.me> <QcOCx8vBMDuw4xf05H5SbIOPee2MZqV5IQa2opvAXcMeMzzFooHYL97qy5ZCLUEjqXHlHoyAucpmkwwU2i3bhO95SJrWP-oRU6mqamnTvRc=@pm.me> <PEvUekkEdjFXIGBrX3GTMxPkeD6Bn6q_UnsVGUSWmjdWfiRJzOXxg6oSoLQBju65BVwoKYaA3YwwhzvTlUvM1MXcWO_K5-ub9_lBkoC28Nk=@proton.me> <c2abfd68-f118-4951-ba4a-499fc819332f@gmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 72003692:user:proton
X-Pm-Message-ID: 9a175c44a3ed48914092d5a3f607ce49b901d00c
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="------28181ae1678496ea12aabdba076df9e0cf71568ee8a80cb5a8fb81e19c0c5be8"; charset=utf-8
X-Original-Sender: conduition@proton.me
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass
header.i=@proton.me header.s=protonmail header.b=Y5pQlo8r; spf=pass
(google.com: domain of conduition@proton.me designates 79.135.106.29 as
permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=conduition@proton.me; dmarc=pass
(p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=proton.me
X-Original-From: conduition <conduition@proton.me>
Reply-To: conduition <conduition@proton.me>
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bitcoindev@googlegroups.com; contact bitcoindev+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bitcoindev.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 786775582512
List-Post: <https://groups.google.com/group/bitcoindev/post>, <mailto:bitcoindev@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <https://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bitcoindev+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <https://groups.google.com/group/bitcoindev
List-Subscribe: <https://groups.google.com/group/bitcoindev/subscribe>, <mailto:bitcoindev+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+786775582512+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
<https://groups.google.com/group/bitcoindev/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--------28181ae1678496ea12aabdba076df9e0cf71568ee8a80cb5a8fb81e19c0c5be8
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary=---------------------3a31977699c472b1d663e8a288ff6a85
-----------------------3a31977699c472b1d663e8a288ff6a85
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hey Jonas, really cool to hear from you on this :)
> For further reductions in size, it may be worth looking
> into "Target Sum Winternitz" [0], where the checksum is
> hardcoded into the verifier instead of being an explicit
> part of the signature, at the cost of additional signing
> complexity.
If you take a second look at the script, we're actually
doing fixed-sum winternitz [0]. For w = 16 as I selected,
the optimal checksum for efficient signing is 512. You can
compute the optimal checksum with the expression `w*(n /
log2(w))/2` where n is the bit-length of the message to
sign.
Though unlike traditional fixed-sum WOTS, I didn't
implement the random salt counter appended to the sig, as
it isn't strictly needed. Remember: we're not WOTS-signing
a static TX sighash - we're signing an EC signature which
in turn signs the TX sighash. We can retry the EC signature
generation step with a new nonce `R` unlimited times until
we get an `(R, s)` pair whose hash fits the hardcoded
checksum requirement.
> I think the size difference largely comes from the fact
> that my implementation [2] is based on W-OTS+ [3] and not
> on W-OTS. The main difference is that W-OTS relies on
> some variant of collision-resistance of the hash
> function, whereas W-OTS+ only relies on the weaker
> preimage resistance property.
Agreed. AFAICT, the only reason we'd use WOTS+ over stock
WOTS (w/o randomizers) would be if we wanted to use a less
collision-resistant hash algo (RMD160) as the primary hash
function. Someone would need to do the math to see if the
hash size savings are enough to offset the added script
size cost.
Maybe you're not the right person to ask, but riddle me
this: Would OP_HASH160 (aka rmd160(sha256(...))) be a
possible contender for the hash function here, to shrink
the witness size further while still retaining some of the
collision resistance of SHA256?
[0]: https://gist.github.com/conduition/c6fd78e90c21f669fad7e3b5fe113182#file-winternitz-ts-L95-L98
regards,
conduition
On Monday, July 7th, 2025 at 3:43 AM, Jonas Nick <jonasd.nick@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi conduition,
>
> Thanks for this work. I think it provides a very useful data point.
>
> For further reductions in size, it may be worth looking into "Target Sum
> Winternitz" [0], where the checksum is hardcoded into the verifier instead
> of being an explicit part of the signature, at the cost of additional
> signing complexity. In this scheme, the signer has to hash their message
> with some randomness, encode into chunks and check if the sum of the chunks
> matches the checksum. If not, they rehash the message with new randomness
> until they have found the randomness that results in the correct checksum.
>
> There is also some more recent work that promises "20% to 40% improvement in
> the verification cost of the signature" [1]. However, I have not read the
> paper and the increase in Bitcoin Script size may eat up theoretical
> reductions in verification cost.
>
> > I believe my construction improves on Jonas', on two counts: [...] My
>
> > script results in much smaller witnesses. 8kb vs 24kb.
>
>
> I think the size difference largely comes from the fact that my
> implementation [2] is based on W-OTS+ [3] and not on W-OTS. The main
> difference is that W-OTS relies on some variant of collision-resistance of
> the hash function, whereas W-OTS+ only relies on the weaker preimage
> resistance property. W-OTS+ is also standardized as part of XMSS [4] in the
> form of a variant that was proven secure a little later [5].
>
> However, using just W-OTS and therefore relying on collision-resistance seems
> okay because Bitcoin already relies on collision-resistance of SHA256. If that
> property was broken, the blockchain and the transaction Merkle tree would not
> provide integrity anymore, resulting in chain splits. Therefore, I suggested [6]
> to change my implementation to a Winternitz variant that does rely on
> collision-resistance and whose Blockchain footprint is smaller. So far, no one
> has implemented that, but it would certainly be very interesting to see if a
> Great Script Restoration based implementation can significantly improve over
> your implementation.
>
> [0] https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/055.pdf
> [1] https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/889.pdf
> [2] https://github.com/jonasnick/GreatRSI
> [3] https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/965.pdf
> [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8391
> [5] https://tches.iacr.org/index.php/TCHES/article/download/8730/8330/5451
> [6] https://github.com/jonasnick/GreatRSI/issues/1#issuecomment-2548062773
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/c2abfd68-f118-4951-ba4a-499fc819332f%40gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/Um1180WhyfREJS4CHTfTCzAuDywzNlFlsaIFFwLEGcETcwKCDuJMgSwSs4idfqgCDqtMTuc4FUmcTHWnK2z_tzxw8bdVD9zDiGTCfdbJFjs%3D%40proton.me.
-----------------------3a31977699c472b1d663e8a288ff6a85
Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; filename="publickey - conduition@proton.me - 0x474891AD.asc"; name="publickey - conduition@proton.me - 0x474891AD.asc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="publickey - conduition@proton.me - 0x474891AD.asc"; name="publickey - conduition@proton.me - 0x474891AD.asc"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-----------------------3a31977699c472b1d663e8a288ff6a85--
--------28181ae1678496ea12aabdba076df9e0cf71568ee8a80cb5a8fb81e19c0c5be8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: ProtonMail
wrsEARYKAG0FgmhsawcJkHgpbO2E9rPFRRQAAAAAABwAIHNhbHRAbm90YXRp
b25zLm9wZW5wZ3Bqcy5vcmeD886WrELY5HiUHvNxUtRGD4+lyjraSmF6JckY
hScGWBYhBEdIka0CMtrLdg13a3gpbO2E9rPFAAChegD/UtcY3O+eWTowLmdq
1p1WLz0heJzZTSxJkBbg4HrmQkgBAPUlkdvD/BXHdEx5mQ2MCnf9N+GsG71Q
3RDUTLCTTTYA
=9pmx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------28181ae1678496ea12aabdba076df9e0cf71568ee8a80cb5a8fb81e19c0c5be8--
|
