1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EB5A7A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:49:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com
[209.85.212.179])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A88F4160
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:49:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicne3 with SMTP id ne3so34974079wic.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=vsZihyyzOnOxFuLurqN4FiRF5biWzMbUYO1OG3rc//c=;
b=ENq+WCKRvIANbOqA2FeVKU8hbMsAs0DxiDF6wGIVKE2VcXJniU5t5YWOzNcviX8yTO
5wAh8XgkEAsGxf70a2iF8J7rYlym1FuOy+y1m6UJtcQdnpY7IhtTY1lJnl0Ds76awGEY
6MTuCDHzPdGXfonmvCVVuPyFBn2WjLPWZpetxkCqm928/yda2g8wsPIw0/ku0QBt20Ix
yh8sjQ3W6qCvU8stdswLFfjQ52q8oNPx7jrHJzxpaD6f9CfMNSdcNTe79L0K8K2BmUpb
STdk7JU26XFhgBQ+5WgWHOz4MhqpNZnj2MOri2HgGKNRgHvmHihfEBmW0qgL6Hx4LDmZ
A4/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkxrhTH5PA58QwC8JihaShgNKkjsKfQXRQA4oot8S/2gz0JrVKzSgU6034ykZs8wTCDCTJ4
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.122.97 with SMTP id lr1mr47124946wjb.26.1439236163387;
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.31.230 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55C8F948.3070705@jrn.me.uk>
References: <55C75FC8.6070807@jrn.me.uk> <201508092346.20301.luke@dashjr.org>
<55C8EE2A.3030309@jrn.me.uk> <201508101841.00173.luke@dashjr.org>
<55C8F948.3070705@jrn.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:49:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDr29yWVREO_cuA_vJ1kbkcb2gk4w1ykBv-dS2r4g=n4eQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Ross Nicoll <jrn@jrn.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Alternative chain support for payment protocol
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:49:26 -0000
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Ross Nicoll via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> That could definitely be done, for example by making the genesis field
> "repeated", so it specifies all potential networks. The response would need
> to indicate which hash it used, but that could be chain tip (with height in
> a further field), and provide fork detection.
No, the chain ID needs to be unique, that's the whole point.
|
