1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
|
Return-Path: <james.obeirne@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8821AC000B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 10 Feb 2022 23:52:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5986340291
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 10 Feb 2022 23:52:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id GvQeN93U1dan
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 10 Feb 2022 23:52:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-yb1-xb35.google.com (mail-yb1-xb35.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18F5F401C9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 10 Feb 2022 23:52:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb35.google.com with SMTP id o19so20017809ybc.12
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:52:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=sURubZ7KYypKjuXaxzWz3DmNp/kVrvNDC/QuHIhE7s8=;
b=CbFi7XxYfYSjMX7OGKivnzqrUbW+L0Zvmrj6KOqLUzEYvacDl8xEt6Uzq5/mrmWVn+
GvKVntlQcSRII1FQxGXnaKWscvA2rdnzsDsPXx0NIDCM/euxveu2O4YyMYtbOBC7M4Jl
ZFOkOgP2NJHux0s/nTHYxV/rtLbNWWWU1+qnZ6VBM0BP2bPTi0mCrrrrBLXYEJ5u1Wjk
8x9rKnEzf6AW3+urVjE40aOorsLyg8IhToEaUx14EjO1OAUY3KDux7baJFDIiNiHPm8d
5xFCfWmE9eb/VVvLQOcpsrg+tPvTVAINf0yB7sdjeR/3lrX758qB9CffqfYCVNQnZZs/
6+lw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=sURubZ7KYypKjuXaxzWz3DmNp/kVrvNDC/QuHIhE7s8=;
b=TbD348zldMFAUjZqP/tGdpY7KU7cbxXWc6j551GJbiTUR+Q51nZAPEAJB9BgQuSvIQ
psX7UikB1XzJ9Obl3pv1Ev0r24bGMxMLoOL5vtyLHahGOC1pZakYnyc3MCwRZTKMyBrc
uorW3dazEhXOHaNqLv4FJdeoElAyJWKBcffREGCuri2K6XXBBNjBBCnu08jFtn+3uehr
Yp8CYA2gNyH3J7+D2CC1XKv3SUnbJkRHk47uO8KQoXXC79Dh+G7gq5zC2r/8h7jN3dcw
Iue63npdJWsWUnYGf4dM9tTllVgB8eNaPWSPJkZrch4tWDP7Vid8AT25pWwH8nuvCvq+
R+gw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532c88h9z4gy/BontpPpGI3MU1MR1ksoyAeOXxznTMTpd3SyhBXn
e2rgXe6L8IpVAGRPaVET93zqYx9o3pSp7ESS9VwBju6RthrjAw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzaQ7F9C4CMPj0VE4mSU7gul0yhXN55YvGaR3XjlQFIMz5YyqeKXb5I5nGZVCilmmh+DMc8bfv2b7EvGWWNv1w=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d846:: with SMTP id p67mr8960482ybg.618.1644537119865;
Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:51:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPfvXfKrnju1fzxOKs3Fx00NOPWHjedF7e4xMSGs8buwc0O2kw@mail.gmail.com>
<9Vw6LCkr2d2uOBanXeIuGxA1fUGGOeV1OHlgBifbmij1Afs0ISjfKK-vmcnRZfBG4GwJhIVLMisjvS_zohS-cW0FkzZaCKa6Mn7VWolznJs=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9Vw6LCkr2d2uOBanXeIuGxA1fUGGOeV1OHlgBifbmij1Afs0ISjfKK-vmcnRZfBG4GwJhIVLMisjvS_zohS-cW0FkzZaCKa6Mn7VWolznJs=@protonmail.com>
From: "James O'Beirne" <james.obeirne@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:51:47 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPfvXfJ6dE2JycEdsK-gimyFwf64RfOen0maRq4LLg5R8RFEbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: darosior <darosior@protonmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d97f4a05d7b2a231"
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Thoughts on fee bumping
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 23:52:02 -0000
--000000000000d97f4a05d7b2a231
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> It's not that simple. As a miner, if i have less than 1vMB of
transactions in my mempool. I don't want a 10sats/vb transaction paying
100000sats by a 100sats/vb transaction paying only 10000sats.
I don't understand why the "<1vMB in the mempool" case is even worth
consideration because the miner will just include the entire mempool in the
next block regardless of feerate.
--000000000000d97f4a05d7b2a231
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">> It's not that simple. As a miner, if i have less =
than 1vMB of=20
transactions in my mempool. I don't want a 10sats/vb transaction paying=
=20
100000sats by a 100sats/vb transaction paying only 10000sats.<div><br></div=
><div>I don't understand why the "<1vMB in the mempool" ca=
se is even worth consideration because the miner will just include the enti=
re mempool in the next block regardless of feerate.<br></div></div>
--000000000000d97f4a05d7b2a231--
|
