1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
|
Return-Path: <jaejoon@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A294FD30
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:36:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1191A7D1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:36:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id f21-v6so3209476wmc.5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=l/+tryFqiK1tMJF+vXYM3NhXiJob19f7oEf3ljJ4qp8=;
b=NGK264p2o6g6qHoArOA+7SQ72mo87WT1Uc+MVPdMlreOkUQIq8Cj+CqA2wpyk/VcPV
sGofDRcMGKnX1HxronPbW3LsbRjsuBaTcJtf2qdLPRr7sFS15wJ3tBSxAaFsHt7TpKkD
EJEtdAXyGMJdHqrsK23TaRNWM5+0M3KKNCya8GyiijykSFVWUTro3rg9L8OSEnumFzTI
JfCZHBfx0aVwKA2M8URrZ6h1VgN92tCMXUnsmD37IFsUNeEJaiE9kXJtyTljZ7V2WX+X
lzubOcjDX+w+fu6RhrLKCnzP4EUWYS7ijTiLR8ENdFH9J/adlREGJiiT7+4yJBYmPZAi
e+9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=l/+tryFqiK1tMJF+vXYM3NhXiJob19f7oEf3ljJ4qp8=;
b=qya4ITWkt09pzYkGXaYUUUBI0wfeRga8qdQmHpdarD5CJ8Z48AKx6fCXKGmaGNRvk6
EYpf4CU8tz67wx3HNcugZB+V8bCpZ30rSZJ0xgy4sHiVc7gFLZZK7wQptq9PyQlwMYfj
mbP+8MgYdhH1PRawvNWILaqZI/ZxRNtKnyVmhuQ6+u1gpToyhznDsM2tIf6l2if6zeKH
+vyyFrA5hWkb2AtX57ZnAgaRw53lB3lp2RrGAqqqhUySy7hfpIkXCDPpxcKra34UWzwN
L+YIyEySTTdpNWO3VSc0DfNE1XOrNu6hlE8v3Ajyg652PASGNWA4K7YQdivtNOJdXoZ8
aNdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51A9WOiIpARYxYZDqd3Xlo3gzfCEw7HG534f28tCUB2EBXyhzPzp
2mRzxXOGbZftvNV0+tjxsHC6MhgAQADa27BY4ChZa2mWTuo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYqlid+Z0STWvC+HEYVnCWtB1Q0pozKlFv+tolKLVVRhuJLsd8epcSEO52MMhV80lp4YaOdvRSZksyxPfkPS0M=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c5cc:: with SMTP id
v195-v6mr2880888wmf.29.1535661389573;
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuOfuh7M6siJW1FzXajsBSeYSu=TBEgx9SAmCbwnP=yb7rJOQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20180830200239.ujuzh7pitcuatdt3@petertodd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180830200239.ujuzh7pitcuatdt3@petertodd.org>
From: Jimmy Song <jaejoon@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:36:16 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJR7vkqt0x6KamB5Bx_bC6Zu0oxJYHHNYHS9i4q4q3++iHRz2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: pete@petertodd.org,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009ef4720574ad0709"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:18:54 +0000
Cc: shiva sitamraju <shiva@blockonomics.co>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testnet3 Reest
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:36:31 -0000
--0000000000009ef4720574ad0709
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Stupid question time:
Why don't we have multiple testnets?
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:31 PM Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:58:42PM +0530, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Testnet is now 1411795 blocks and a full sync is taking atleast 48 hours.
> >
> > Is a testnet reset scheduled in the next release or any reason not to do
> a
> > reset ?
> >
> > Fast onboarding/lower disk overheads would be very much appreicated for
> > testing purposes
>
> Actually I'd advocate the opposite: I'd want testnet to be a *larger*
> blockchain than mainnet to find size-related issues first.
>
> Note that for testing regtest is often a better alternative, and you can
> setup
> private regtest blockchains fairly easily and with good control over
> exactly
> when and how blocks are created.
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--0000000000009ef4720574ad0709
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Stupid question time:<div><br></div><div>Why don't we =
have multiple testnets?</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=
=3D"ltr">On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:31 PM Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <<a =
href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.lin=
uxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" =
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On =
Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:58:42PM +0530, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev wrot=
e:<br>
> Hi,<br>
> <br>
> Testnet is now 1411795 blocks and a full sync is taking atleast 48 hou=
rs.<br>
> <br>
> Is a testnet reset scheduled in the next release or any reason not to =
do a<br>
> reset ?<br>
> <br>
> Fast onboarding/lower disk overheads would be=C2=A0 very much appreica=
ted for<br>
> testing purposes<br>
<br>
Actually I'd advocate the opposite: I'd want testnet to be a *large=
r*<br>
blockchain than mainnet to find size-related issues first.<br>
<br>
Note that for testing regtest is often a better alternative, and you can se=
tup<br>
private regtest blockchains fairly easily and with good control over exactl=
y<br>
when and how blocks are created.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<a href=3D"https://petertodd.org" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http=
s://petertodd.org</a> 'peter'[:-1]@<a href=3D"http://petertodd.org"=
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">petertodd.org</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
--0000000000009ef4720574ad0709--
|
