1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <alexy.kot.all@gmail.com>) id 1WQhak-0001AI-MA
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:21:22 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.220.169; envelope-from=alexy.kot.all@gmail.com;
helo=mail-vc0-f169.google.com;
Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WQhaj-0005wk-Kl
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:21:22 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ik5so1456356vcb.0
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.58.54.35 with SMTP id g3mr1636446vep.46.1395339676121; Thu,
20 Mar 2014 11:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: alexy.kot.all@gmail.com
Received: by 10.59.0.38 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0J849oDvMWjf8LWi0xj44Q8DaUwDip5_smVBMNgeQ3mw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <lc5hmg$1jh$1@ger.gmane.org> <leuunm$tjk$1@ger.gmane.org>
<CANEZrP3nQfvDArKTRgje0Cus4G2JD_zpxSjA3fXfxM2TNAP80Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CALDj+BafD+6KTNcYDBEu5gNPzYozSkiC-JCxrY-PzXL2DYBRsw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0N4J_Z907+D0ENSNKfNAW2N=7Jf4JzSCO=SU558GtGTzA@mail.gmail.com>
<lge7nk$3mf$2@ger.gmane.org>
<CANEZrP0J849oDvMWjf8LWi0xj44Q8DaUwDip5_smVBMNgeQ3mw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alex Kotenko <alexykot@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:20:36 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: -m6hFOxY7R3O_prpeF-jIGCdjKc
Message-ID: <CALDj+BZJ0rSKuDHdbL7ANN0Vtaa3-KGYgusqMDzzB-CUxjMz7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cbcb4bc800304f50dd515
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(alexy.kot.all[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WQhaj-0005wk-Kl
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol for Face-to-face Payments
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:21:22 -0000
--089e013cbcb4bc800304f50dd515
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hmm, is there any other way to do it? Can we provide a signed payment
request and verify the sign on receiving side and this way protect from
bluetooth MitM attack? Quick googling showed that SSL over bluetooth isn't
a very well developed area, and my own skills are not enough to quickly
implement a reliable secure solution here.
2014-03-20 10:36 GMT+00:00 Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>:
> Encoding entire payment requests into qrcodes is definitely not the way to
> go. They can already be large when signed and we're just at the start of
> adding features.
>
> Finishing off and standardising the bluetooth support is the way to go
> (r=bt:mac). Andreas' app already has some support for this I believe, so
> Alex you could prototype with that, but we need to:
>
> 1) Add an encryption/auth layer on top, because it runs over RFCOMM
> sockets. The authentication would require proof of owning the Bitcoin key
> that's in the address part of the URI (which is needed for backwards compat
> anyway).
>
> 2) Write a BIP for it and make sure it's interoperable
>
> For the auth layer we could either use SSL and then just ignore the server
> certificate and require signing of the session public key with the Bitcoin
> key, which should be easy to code up but is rather heavy on the air, or
> roll a custom lightweight thing where we just do a basic ECDH, with the
> servers key being the same as the address key. But rolling such protocols
> is subtle and I guess it'd need to be reviewed by people familiar with such
> things.
>
> This feels like a good opportunity to grow the community - perhaps we can
> find a volunteer in the forums who enjoys crypto.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
--089e013cbcb4bc800304f50dd515
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:courier =
new,monospace;color:#003300">Hmm, is there any other way to do it? Can we p=
rovide a signed payment request and verify the sign on receiving side and t=
his way protect from bluetooth MitM attack? Quick googling showed that SSL =
over bluetooth isn't a very well developed area, and my own skills are =
not enough to quickly implement a reliable secure solution here.</div>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><=
div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2014-03-20 10:36 GMT+0=
0:00 Mike Hearn <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">mike@plan99.net</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra">=
Encoding entire payment requests into qrcodes is definitely not the way to =
go. They can already be large when signed and we're just at the start o=
f adding features.</div>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra">
<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">Finishing off and standardising the bl=
uetooth support is the way to go (r=3Dbt:mac). Andreas' app already has=
some support for this I believe, so Alex you could prototype with that, bu=
t we need to:</div>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">1) Add an e=
ncryption/auth layer on top, because it runs over RFCOMM sockets. The authe=
ntication would require proof of owning the Bitcoin key that's in the a=
ddress part of the URI (which is needed for backwards compat anyway).</div>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">2) Write a =
BIP for it and make sure it's interoperable</div><div class=3D"gmail_ex=
tra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">For the auth layer we could eithe=
r use SSL and then just ignore the server certificate and require signing o=
f the session public key with the Bitcoin key, which should be easy to code=
up but is rather heavy on the air, or roll a custom lightweight thing wher=
e we just do a basic ECDH, with the servers key being the same as the addre=
ss key. But rolling such protocols is subtle and I guess it'd need to b=
e reviewed by people familiar with such things.</div>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">This feels =
like a good opportunity to grow the community - perhaps we can find a volun=
teer in the forums who enjoys crypto.</div></div>
<br>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------<br>
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book<br>
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases =
and their<br>
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,<br>
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!<br>
<a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech" target=3D"_blank">http://p.sf=
.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech</a><br>_____________________________________________=
__<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
--089e013cbcb4bc800304f50dd515--
|
