1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <ayeowch@gmail.com>) id 1UcvPJ-0002C7-NA
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 16 May 2013 10:27:33 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.214.43 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.214.43; envelope-from=ayeowch@gmail.com;
helo=mail-bk0-f43.google.com;
Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1UcvPI-0005bR-Pm
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 16 May 2013 10:27:33 +0000
Received: by mail-bk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id jm19so1595130bkc.30
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 16 May 2013 03:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.205.115.73 with SMTP id fd9mr12610991bkc.58.1368700046302;
Thu, 16 May 2013 03:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.203.15 with HTTP; Thu, 16 May 2013 03:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130516100206.82680@gmx.com>
References: <20130516100206.82680@gmx.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 20:27:26 +1000
Message-ID: <CAA3bHnw3PjxT3v_7O_GAYiO3b2RtuGAi67NXkOqFPYZTmBLsFQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Addy Yeow <ayeowch@gmail.com>
To: bitcoingrant@gmx.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(ayeowch[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money
X-Headers-End: 1UcvPI-0005bR-Pm
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Modularizing Bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:27:33 -0000
> Such developments would significantly strengthen the system. Modularizati=
on would make cancer attacks less likely and increase the node count, which=
, currently, is fairly low.
Do we know for certain or at least a rough figure of the node count in
the network?
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:02 PM, <bitcoingrant@gmx.com> wrote:
> One of the primary upcoming priorities for bitcoin=92s infrastructure, be=
yond
> the bloom filter, will be the continued modularization of the system.
>
> Here at the Bitcoin Grant, we would like to jump start this development w=
ith
> a financial incentive and initiate an ongoing conversation on how we can
> work together towards developing a smarter, more efficient system of
> tomorrow, today.
>
> Up for grabs: 500 bitcoins or $500,000; whichever is greater.
>
> Taking on a project of this scope is a highly intensive, technical
> undertaking and we believe excellent developers should be compensated as
> such, especially when it comes to open source projects.
>
> One of the main goals will be to separate the wallet from the node, as we
> have already done with mining. This way, the wallet, which will only hold
> private keys and create transactions, would pass transactions directly to=
a
> relay node, based on the bloom filter. Meanwhile, the block node will
> maintain the block chain and validate and relay new blocks.
>
> Such developments would significantly strengthen the system. Modularizati=
on
> would make cancer attacks less likely and increase the node count, which,
> currently, is fairly low.
>
> This is by no means is a feature request, merely ideas as to initiate a
> discussion. We welcome any feedback or suggestions. And of course, let us
> know if you would like to contribute to this project by submiting a grant
> proposal.
>
> http://bitcoingrant.org
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete
> security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and
> efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls
> from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
|
