summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bf/dc06a6fad72132fad8545d0b2da05e6252b050
blob: 86b726e203ddb114f716f3e53739e19748db42f8 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1YmM8Q-00005T-Ol
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:58:10 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.212.181; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-wi0-f181.google.com; 
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YmM8P-00063u-K4
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:58:10 +0000
Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so63321555wiu.1
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun, 26 Apr 2015 05:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.206.66 with SMTP id lm2mr13724961wjc.79.1430053083572;
	Sun, 26 Apr 2015 05:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.188.11 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 05:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHabJ+O7n=_ACXJx6_2DzoFC6h=2dk0aR3u3_LZhHgDut1gNMA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHabJ+Mn0=vfLvTJ+z3tx8cFAAuLD1pLp4rOe3pM6MtCrCxjwg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1AE7B0A2-90EE-42EE-9D30-4DC1B5892E53@newcastle.ac.uk>
	<CAHabJ+NDqMN-rQ1BN1TfOjGLQHH-3Wd28LdoF95Agn4HdRrThg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHabJ+PMdQ-f7G8RNz0R7mfGUwBMAsnCyO=NmQhxyq0+gB1aPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgSAT2otym64oUACpWD8jWLAB6dBusONn-WUx2DK59SB5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHabJ+O7n=_ACXJx6_2DzoFC6h=2dk0aR3u3_LZhHgDut1gNMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 14:58:03 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: nNKNCmpTdNYX-T-tSt8RCDyhVGo
Message-ID: <CANEZrP20sFUHcabC4+JyR3rv6Xi9AXCUYo__3ZkfWyDjm1YQ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Justus Ranvier <justus.ranvier@monetas.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b873d520e6f710514a02ee7
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YmM8P-00063u-K4
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Reusable payment codes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:58:10 -0000

--047d7b873d520e6f710514a02ee7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Could you maybe write a short bit of text comparing this approach to
extending BIP70 and combining it with a simple Subspace style
store-and-forward network?

--047d7b873d520e6f710514a02ee7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Could you maybe write a short bit of text comparing this approach to extending BIP70 and combining it with a simple Subspace style store-and-forward network?</div></div>

--047d7b873d520e6f710514a02ee7--