summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bc/75cdb3f1fc308fa9cd4799b5a3d4f73646b15e
blob: f25290b9294bea75d71ef124ea30953eb3598201 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
Return-Path: <staf@stafverhaegen.be>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53F77B59
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:39:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from lvps83-169-4-30.dedicated.hosteurope.de
	(lvps83-169-4-30.dedicated.hosteurope.de [83.169.4.30])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F5CC242
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:39:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 3087 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2017 20:39:16 +0200
Received: from unknown (HELO hpdc7800) (10.0.0.1)
	by 10.0.0.2 with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 11 Apr 2017 20:39:16 +0200
Message-ID: <1491935951.7267.29.camel@stafverhaegen.be>
From: Staf Verhaegen <staf@stafverhaegen.be>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:39:11 +0200
In-Reply-To: <a0ee44da-62ad-47dd-97b2-6eb85cbe5cde@Spark>
References: <CAJR7vkpRhNsQsem-nFkeubX04xx1y7aHwCENfg0d1266oOsXMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<Cwhn7YzwaDUZtOygDAgrU1UXjRPG-EiH3Fyz2c95gqOpNnNbiYL1NvhS28yK5wLJCnIqDaBrM6c574dY-O6_-bRjLIFmDe2NCxIuyV1w2dw=@protonmail.com>
	<CAJowKg+tYK9j5LTwokMGutD+-SjBQ70U=X7rqHMGSeaG2NEo9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<f71d2435-7f5a-42a6-8244-ff13bf9a0599@Spark>
	<CAJowKgKmYuBJskZwzC_kjDJHCW8s1+9kCXOO4NbYdt2rPJ4=Ow@mail.gmail.com>
	<a0ee44da-62ad-47dd-97b2-6eb85cbe5cde@Spark>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gZW7ILjc1ynvcyCN3R+7"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 (3.12.11-22.el7) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR
	autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:53:17 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Small Modification to Segwit
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:39:20 -0000


--=-gZW7ILjc1ynvcyCN3R+7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

g via bitcoin-dev schreef op ma 10-04-2017 om 20:39 [-0600]:

>=20
> However, we need to consider the environmental impact of mining, which
> currently consumes a quite exorbitant amount of energy. Any ideas on
> this front?

Everything is relative. Some months ago I did some investigation and
Bitcoin mining used lees energy than the diesel used by the gold ore
mining industry...

greets,
Staf.



--=-gZW7ILjc1ynvcyCN3R+7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EABEIAAYFAljtItMACgkQWIjyN0LdGqxIIQD9E91XT527ViQr141seRe50Pe5
ouant2JkJP4ZdlvkGFYBAKcynSdm8AzCTw3b6pRTpgWelVXbHNO7UmkRijUxBgvo
=JIrv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-gZW7ILjc1ynvcyCN3R+7--