summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bc/542be9d31f9b7b985ed02e179ff4b0ef227db8
blob: 67ec06905dcf97e455395e0a657eb6231137ca81 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>) id 1YJqbv-00035n-8Y
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 06 Feb 2015 21:38:47 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.213.182 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.213.182; envelope-from=pieter.wuille@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ig0-f182.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com ([209.85.213.182])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YJqbu-0003xB-DL
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 06 Feb 2015 21:38:47 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id h15so5709609igd.3
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:38:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.3.36 with SMTP id 36mr13011907iod.92.1423258721050; Fri,
	06 Feb 2015 13:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.20.229 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:38:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgRy0-ORuZ-o02uszqRE+9e5sZNf-OewmsZFoHZpem8mcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBhk7F2OHT64i2LNSjv8DR5tD3RJkLJGzPGZW8OPQTCjQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBj62GwsBAEpTPWR+Lk4xgT1snUHt=3QpHQwTpCxKXzmAQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgRy0-ORuZ-o02uszqRE+9e5sZNf-OewmsZFoHZpem8mcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:38:40 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPg+sBgJXemASC1H3n0op1zEj6wFRgZAdZTYsREj3zsFFcpF1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
X-Headers-End: 1YJqbu-0003xB-DL
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 21:38:47 -0000

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to request a BIP number for this.
>
> Sure. BIP0066.

Four implementations exist now:
* for master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5713 (merged)
* for 0.10.0: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5714 (merged,
and included in 0.10.0rc4)
* for 0.9.4: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5762
* for 0.8.6: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5765

The 0.8 and 0.9 version have reduced test code, as many tests rely on
new test framework code in 0.10 and later, but the implementation code
is identical. Work to improve that is certainly welcome.

-- 
Pieter