1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
|
Return-Path: <sjors@sprovoost.nl>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3A5FA92
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:20:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.25])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D036820D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:20:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2194C20C76
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 16:20:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 27 Sep 2017 16:20:58 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sprovoost.nl; h=
content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
:references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc
:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=CXCyNfCM7WwLr+jjH1Z6h3e0wLNnk5tSMfW/Cm4s1
Qc=; b=Hknm7rumD577T0XYWxM9plXwBTYfqyRkUVNb5HS9l8jIywzuOAaXV/bEo
C6PDP/YcMlfPAd9Cx1pZ6a4ElxiNQKwYueJ8JECefy2QDyCJW1/0iFcaJ3cLFAEv
rbRkPOxO5FgE2m/SWmW2SGTqVM7jXQL4f+jAOy+6gAtbbd0MhwCxQVifNO29/Waw
8VETmKb3+oMlr5yyaX+V6CLbWXqbjDTiYvll/nHUrU0JRPC8TQfx3ZCP0+aB1GkA
teficw4pFpCYeM9efI3uIyL46ft3QxiAvUcMaYhyNCAjlbpWorBuXt264/j3gEVs
Z3uqHO6mSKNzFaLw/49RkoFyW4nBQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=CXCyNfCM7WwLr+jjH1
Z6h3e0wLNnk5tSMfW/Cm4s1Qc=; b=ei65U9gqD7Toq7Yn/2+9uvX+OrWgaa4TFj
XryYsitOzLJQ4Hy0iBVguO54EMFUl43szG9g4GZ8FdZ7xredk+MMMnJI4MPZLGlE
x1y71qxvCRtjGjGkK26Gvnj5zUIXkornQrJ/ui7Z/mN0lCC9t3aOA05fxePqbb+D
mgZZBUZhPJmrTFOBk9PxyXx+JlLMQJXD9eby7MCuNemWQM9ArG+PgPi9YwWMDXw9
hniczJGvjMQ4ITvvSCMhuYbDWu3kuBJtRz15rGZWRwX5LHGsjzH3F2LiIMbIPeu0
9oAxFVaYYcgQtMZKrZ3WuW8Y0kx4NkdkYmD3CZ//jnWWH0dEm3KQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:KgjMWQ1q3BFy-31_x85MNy6kKYkzr07eTWSPf7dtazAAKkCgferssQ>
X-Sasl-enc: JCLQ/lJwNRxLQC6TS1f13UpYewssTpe7P+jkuhXesLXr 1506543657
Received: from [192.168.0.108] (unknown [78.96.81.19])
by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 512D67F3CA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 16:20:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sjors Provoost <sjors@sprovoost.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_B6E4FBDB-F52A-4F3C-A20B-02ACA22F4432";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.0 \(3445.1.6\))
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 23:20:54 +0300
References: <201709271856.27376.luke@dashjr.org>
<CABaSBaz=pMfTz2UF-WpyxrkGY9XZO+zTHR7-Oie79J1Ap10hpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABaSBaz=pMfTz2UF-WpyxrkGY9XZO+zTHR7-Oie79J1Ap10hpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <965940AD-A698-4B5F-9909-105E8A32B398@sprovoost.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.1.6)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:22:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revising BIP 2 to expand editorial authority
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:20:59 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_B6E4FBDB-F52A-4F3C-A20B-02ACA22F4432
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_2E2C93E2-F229-4CEF-82FC-B129836B592C"
--Apple-Mail=_2E2C93E2-F229-4CEF-82FC-B129836B592C
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Op 27 sep. 2017, om 22:01 heeft Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev =
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> het volgende geschreven:
>=20
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev =
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org =
<mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> What do people think about modifying BIP 2 to allow editors to merge =
these
> kinds of changes without involving the Authors? Strictly speaking, BIP =
2
> shouldn't be changed now that it is Active, but for such a minor =
revision, I
> think an exception is reasonable.
>=20
> Even minor revisions can not change the meaning of text. Changing a =
single word can often have a strange impact on the meaning of the text. =
There should be some amount of care exercised here. Maybe it would be =
okay as long as edits are mentioned in the changelog at the bottom of =
each document, or mention that the primary authors have not reviewed =
suggested changes, or something as much; otherwise the reader might not =
be aware to check revision history to see what's going on.
Perhaps it's enough to @mention authors in the PR and give them a week =
to object before merging?
Sjors
--Apple-Mail=_2E2C93E2-F229-4CEF-82FC-B129836B592C
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=us-ascii
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=3D""><br =
class=3D""><div>Op 27 sep. 2017, om 22:01 heeft Bryan Bishop via =
bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" =
class=3D"">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> het volgende =
geschreven:<br class=3D""><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><div dir=3D"ltr" =
class=3D""><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, =
Sep 27, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr" =
class=3D""><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" =
target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> =
wrote:<br class=3D""><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 =
0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">What do people =
think about modifying BIP 2 to allow editors to merge these<br class=3D"">=
kinds of changes without involving the Authors? Strictly speaking, BIP =
2<br class=3D"">
shouldn't be changed now that it is Active, but for such a minor =
revision, I<br class=3D"">
think an exception is reasonable.<br class=3D""></blockquote><div =
class=3D""><br class=3D"">Even minor revisions can not change the =
meaning of text. Changing a single word can often have a strange impact =
on the meaning of the text. There should be some amount of care =
exercised here. Maybe it would be okay as long as edits are mentioned in =
the changelog at the bottom of each document, or mention that the =
primary authors have not reviewed suggested changes, or something as =
much; otherwise the reader might not be aware to check revision history =
to see what's going on.<br =
class=3D""></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br =
class=3D""><div class=3D"">Perhaps it's enough to @mention authors in =
the PR and give them a week to object before merging?</div><div =
class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">Sjors</div></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail=_2E2C93E2-F229-4CEF-82FC-B129836B592C--
--Apple-Mail=_B6E4FBDB-F52A-4F3C-A20B-02ACA22F4432
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=I277
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_B6E4FBDB-F52A-4F3C-A20B-02ACA22F4432--
|
