1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
|
Return-Path: <alicexbt@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E17C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:15:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EAF402F9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:15:10 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org A9EAF402F9
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=protonmail3 header.b=gehiPD7g
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id S3A6JmqPbeKK
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:15:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 6B9B6402F8
Received: from mail-4325.protonmail.ch (mail-4325.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.25])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B9B6402F8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:15:09 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:14:58 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=protonmail3; t=1658862907; x=1659122107;
bh=rv6W6QvnAWDGXiv1+bHBhT8emsRwDxrWaR2lJcUwJYk=;
h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:
References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:
Feedback-ID:Message-ID;
b=gehiPD7gWItf/4n+hD26wOOwTmNH8wTmEs/ra+XrTQSJ353hmSNbVxcfpB7Dz7unH
KVFRWwWjQqVeVXulGz+G+/V0osig1IRNiii22Kni25/0KhYKJMrxkV94jZmOG6a1/N
5YcVG48ottltdi2W3VEZsVCN6hJWWQe7AaBxf82RZ99Hxy8b0FBX7rtQWdUkP9/Mo4
5KuTz7Sb9f2AGyCGf2TuHePsbPJBq0FOVG5oceZlmsjSBafDCaJfvmo6JT+yJ2gS59
X0vNN2wsIS5/cAS4GH2OZO8mNtke0ZZfCRurqX+LuhiBMcEhGmMcwzT0YhmaF+eXEh
lVagvCvsVwPTQ==
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
From: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <SppYz6wiC4AWMEMr_1eWj67uOpDvBQQ5c3HVEjx53n3qVXB8cgm2wO3hOeQIqFewFXonL85fYFcmsjDfdnrv8l0fdVm8TGTb9yVfdtlV61c=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8CD1F5D4-9260-4BE7-B710-993955AB58C8@petertodd.org>
References: <CAGHFe1BXdTkPZn4r_KTxYoz0sqcMsV830dm5JTTFURxDezBnDQ@mail.gmail.com>
<Ue6CCWgdkGc1VPF4yAP252kg3h-6U6xCZZ7hs9w6vDM7LBWsAaksRkLIpkrE39HLmI35Fu3cHC3-WA8Q9Ij3Z7YhAqzJbkytBqU9ZbfruB0=@protonmail.com>
<8CD1F5D4-9260-4BE7-B710-993955AB58C8@petertodd.org>
Feedback-ID: 40602938:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 23:17:32 +0000
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:15:10 -0000
Hi Peter,
> But to a first approximation, at any fee above zero failing to mine a tx =
you know about is leaving money on the table
Let's assume 10000 people go from A to B every day in flight. They buy tick=
ets for different prices and some of them are looking to pay the minimum ev=
en if it's a morning flight, not preferred seat etc. If the minimum price f=
or ticket drops, will this increase the revenue for airlines?
Some people who avoided flight earlier might book with new minimum although=
most of them already figured out other ways to travel or paid the old mini=
mum. Maximum people or weight for a flight would still remain the same.
/dev/fd0
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
------- Original Message -------
On Tuesday, July 26th, 2022 at 7:57 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wro=
te:
>
> On July 26, 2022 2:19:32 PM GMT+02:00, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev bitcoin-d=
ev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> > Hi Aaradhya,
> >
> > > As it's not a consensus rule, I think it can be done easily, just nee=
ding support from full node operators
> >
> > A few miners will need to use a lower minrelaytxfee for this to work. I=
don't think miners would want to lower their profits.
>
>
> Whether or not this lowers profits for a particular miner is complex:
>
> https://petertodd.org/2016/block-publication-incentives-for-miners
>
> But to a first approximation, at any fee above zero failing to mine a tx =
you know about is leaving money on the table.
>
> Anyway even if miners don't actually mine these txs by themselves, with C=
hild-Pays-For-Parent, allowing near-zero txs into your mempool potentially =
allows you to mine more fees.
|
