1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <thomas@thomaszander.se>) id 1XjEok-0008DG-Sv
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:00:42 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([84.210.184.8])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1XjEoi-0007iw-Ui for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:00:42 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA52F407FE
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10032) with ESMTP id eQwPAUZHg4Lp
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D565B4076C
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net
Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10026) with ESMTP id KGPACXlLngRm
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from coldstorage.localnet (cm-84.208.97.23.getinternet.no
[84.208.97.23])
by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66534070A
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:24 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 23:00:23 +0100
Message-ID: <2462434.74aohssIDn@coldstorage>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16-3-amd64; KDE/4.14.1; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CADfmNEke=i+WWfJH0d5e7x5mbvGVuujK-LDke=6PRR_d_Vuhig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE28kUS-uDbd_Br3H5BxwRm1PZFpOwLhcyyZT9b1_VfRaBC9jw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPf5XX6aDGpNxNorbU_JddwpDhnCdX7z=8MskagorC9qUL+T=Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CADfmNEke=i+WWfJH0d5e7x5mbvGVuujK-LDke=6PRR_d_Vuhig@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1XjEoi-0007iw-Ui
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: death by halving
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:00:43 -0000
On Tuesday 28. October 2014 22.44.50 Ferdinando M. Ametrano wrote:
> It amazes me that basic economic considerations seems completely lost here,
> especially when it comes to mining.
Please don't confuse people dismissing your thoughts with dismissing the basic
economic considerations. The fact of the matter is that you didn't read the
archives where these ideas have been brought forward and discussed, a
consensus was reached. (it wasn't so basic afterall)
The fact that people don't want to repeat the discussion just for your sake is
not the same as people not listening to those arguments.
|
