1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
|
Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D38D0415
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:59:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-40133.protonmail.ch (mail-40133.protonmail.ch
[185.70.40.133])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BC3C1C0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:59:54 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:59:44 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=default; t=1555297192;
bh=xroD9VpCIC36ccElmT4/dpQ+MhlY+XAOo4CHYhUgRWI=;
h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Feedback-ID:
From;
b=aLmosgkt5zI23BUunluA2eJtL7Cf57mDYshTHhdL+G8nyhyNJhOq8U75PEGgQE4h6
8LVDxH9wSMGeTCBnOucSEsgSB63lzqf7bBW9f9C25/jXTw2Z37ru01IqpMIJ8HAFH1
3soF67t2BGef7S4AzU/HE7PLkZ7F1TBRlVcHnE5Q=
To: LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH <willtech@live.com.au>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <uwXr_PVDhAxPgfWwqANXIj4h0dyTW8ID4H9SMr1Aw6hYGfiB722bIcmhsZtyKMkdDUN9TzJUtcFxQ_mTvbjsqDKOIX4UtkBpl_4q_EpS1Cg=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <PS2P216MB01792E6227170E85F95A2BB49D2A0@PS2P216MB0179.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <PS2P216MB01792E6227170E85F95A2BB49D2A0@PS2P216MB0179.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Feedback-ID: el4j0RWPRERue64lIQeq9Y2FP-mdB86tFqjmrJyEPR9VAtMovPEo9tvgA0CrTsSHJeeyPXqnoAu6DN-R04uJUg==:Ext:ProtonMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 03:06:48 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] List of proposals for hard fork/soft fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:59:55 -0000
Good morning LORD YOUR EXCELLENCY,
May it please you to be informed the below are likely to be included in som=
e kind of upcoming softfork for SegWit v1:
1. Schnorr signatures.
2. MuSig.
3. Taproot.
4. `SIGHASH_NOINPUT`.
5. Signature aggregation. May it please you to be informed, that "Schnorr=
" enables signature aggregation, but is not signature aggregation itself.
6. MAST.
The above may or may not be an exhaustive list, your excellency.
Of these, I believe only `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` has a BIP, may it please your ex=
cellency to learn that it is BIP 118.
However, I am sorry to inform your excellency, as I understand the `SIGHASH=
_NOINPUT` that will eventually reach Bitcoin Core will not match the curren=
t version of BIP118.
To improve on the possibility of incorrect use of `SIGHASH_NOINPUT`, it is =
proposed that every input that is signed with a `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` signature=
additionally require a signature without `SIGHASH_NOINPUT`.
For other details, I am sorry to inform your excellency, I have no reliable=
knowledge.
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me=
ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90
On Sunday, April 14, 2019 10:44 PM, LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitc=
oin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Is anybody keeping a list of the solid proposals > BIP's to be included i=
n any actual future consensus-driven fork? Perhaps pre-consensus voting of =
what to include in the fork packages?
>
> Surely not every or each proposal ever scouted is on for consideration.
>
> This may actually help to build momentum for useful and valuable implemen=
tations that may otherwise languish.
>
> Regards,
> LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH
|
