1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
|
Return-Path: <ctpacia@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720268EA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 22:15:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com
[209.85.213.181])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098BB11D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 22:15:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igui7 with SMTP id i7so23572949igu.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=V3hpMGJrXuc03igyu8+NCvoXy4ifG/Je2Q4Zizwy/3Q=;
b=RfCqBVndEHBZFa306eRl+R3iefetRxNSo2TlxwNwEw3f8OcAaxmJm9sdR3pOtlAkEb
7NEIq8acTz+bRPHHSYQ1ZKDHVpTj2ZXx0/qWOd52jWWf00SLXh9J5y3iiNorH/VeS7Lk
9/5EFc2zI0FzHop9+mMb6vaLFcRC3WJ+veGhn0VOjOlyzxj2BZ8is231LmzfyRgiV7AA
/w4Ep3IG0OAw2ZXewXtzMayGV5L5hbP0Gov1S0+5zqlqwb8A1FW3rTcO9208d1TgvZy/
g/qU0FTQUefFm8Trr3Nk7Sjkz+og9w8hlYZegitl0x+UNGY+OS/9dBmlmEKAN6r/CM76
idCg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.80.14 with SMTP id n14mr4462703igx.30.1440195316416; Fri,
21 Aug 2015 15:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.144.196 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.144.196 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150821060716.GA31674@muck>
References: <55D6AD19.10305@mattcorallo.com>
<CADm_WcZJEe4fz4dLYKeOzC0CWbM=-o92BvEF0qiGvNwyMjrEiA@mail.gmail.com>
<20150821055534.GA27259@muck>
<CADm_WcanqF7oHn7huKuYP8iFWmY4XE58tG01M_Nqg9qx6YFu9A@mail.gmail.com>
<20150821060716.GA31674@muck>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 18:15:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAB+qUq5H1Ggzgdc-X7CPAz9orhMgPgQc4_G8TdC-oeSr174p1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Pacia <ctpacia@gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149c0c63e08b5051dd99a2f
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 22:15:17 -0000
--089e0149c0c63e08b5051dd99a2f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Aug 21, 2015 2:07 AM, "Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Also, as I mentioned, just look at the popularity of wallets such as
> Mycelium that are not adopting bloom filters, but going with SPV
> verification of block headers w/ lookup servers.
Related I recently had a conversation with a Mycelium employee who told me
they were considering moving to spv/bloom because of the server issues
Andreas mentioned.
I don't know any more about their plans, but I wouldn't assume the above
statement to be correct.
--089e0149c0c63e08b5051dd99a2f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Aug 21, 2015 2:07 AM, "Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev" <<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:</p>
<p dir="ltr">> Also, as I mentioned, just look at the popularity of wallets such as<br>
> Mycelium that are not adopting bloom filters, but going with SPV<br>
> verification of block headers w/ lookup servers.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Related I recently had a conversation with a Mycelium employee who told me they were considering moving to spv/bloom because of the server issues Andreas mentioned. </p>
<p dir="ltr">I don't know any more about their plans, but I wouldn't assume the above statement to be correct.</p>
--089e0149c0c63e08b5051dd99a2f--
|
