1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1SfoKU-0004Pe-T7
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:25:58 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.125.82.175; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
helo=mail-we0-f175.google.com;
Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1SfoKS-0006JW-Id
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:25:58 +0000
Received: by werg55 with SMTP id g55so2924403wer.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.8.69 with SMTP id p5mr10052714wia.17.1339835148179; Sat,
16 Jun 2012 01:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.254.232 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1339785752.91313.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <CA+8xBpecVQcTTbPxUm_3_GWC99dEd4=-VFWb+QT6jUy4rg8U4w@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP0kNZDByHpK2=UjP+ag0X1KmqHxnJdm=e_pWMitP4QvvA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+8xBpcwhQPQRe=stYb9xksLsTbiABKLS7PZnRtvPga6AmSg4Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP39RHfCDX-x4ARo+oPphLv-70RxuMh3+AJzsNPxzOd=bA@mail.gmail.com>
<1339785752.91313.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 10:25:48 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: zo8bsc8flwKL-ezIdiyLXCMLi6U
Message-ID: <CANEZrP037ZFr=NgVGQh3zU5fbEs9_03AdBjdNaUTwKjZvwoFmQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1SfoKS-0006JW-Id
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New P2P commands for diagnostics,
SPV clients
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:25:59 -0000
The bottleneck for the android Bitcoin Wallet app is rapidly becoming
bandwidth and parse time.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Why though? The bottleneck is not network traffic but disk space usage/bl=
ockchain validation time.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
> To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
> Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 3:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New P2P commands for diagnostics, SPV =
clients
>
>> Yes, the format is something that must be hashed out (no pun
>> intended). =C2=A0Need input from potential users about what information
>> they might need.
>
> Matts point that a branch-per-transaction may duplicate data is well
> made, that said, I suspect a format that tries to fix this would be
> much more complicated.
>
> How about see this project as a three part change?
>
> First step - add the mempool command and make nodes sync up their
> mempools on startup.
>
> Second step - if protocol version >=3D X, the "block" message consists
> of a header + num transactions + vector<hash>=C2=A0 instead of the full
> transactions themselves.
>
> On receiving such a block, we go look to see which transactions we're
> missing from the mempool and request them with getdata. Each time we
> receive a tx message we check to see if it was one we were missing
> from a block. Once all transactions in the block message are in
> memory, we go ahead and assemble the block, then verify as per normal.
> This should speed up block propagation. Miners have an incentive to
> upgrade because it should reduce wasted work.
>
> Third step - new message, getmerkletx takes a vector<hash> and returns
> a merkletx message: "merkle branch missing the root + transaction data
> itself" for each requested transaction. The filtering commands are
> added, so the block message now only lists transaction hashes that
> match the filter which can then be requested with getmerkletx.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
|
