1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
|
Return-Path: <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01F1C000E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 28 Jun 2021 08:23:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997A3400ED
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 28 Jun 2021 08:23:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 4URT96KSqeFI
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 28 Jun 2021 08:23:12 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-oi1-x22f.google.com (mail-oi1-x22f.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22f])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8853C400BE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 28 Jun 2021 08:23:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id t40so21103179oiw.8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 28 Jun 2021 01:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=sPcdi9plosHirG7YPp92pnkc7kEhJBgycSCjEnJxNNo=;
b=uiItMKrTBot06J9FZ0W3hj+uUg0esxIG+nvX0r0BV+5UZfj2tVQlWt6Lte3fyYrWCz
Chiwhjm4AnDnG0AhMVdSbV8GWLkVBseXc0+RAccKnR2jtCiWA1tlHM/huNkGQlxOHyfR
un4yXp2p/hpNzpTVxRvRVdxQZAl1gs0wXC5JvsKxZxV9le3kuT1V1OOXYMFkUQgCzCPV
swepxuCT0R1h6OSMvdIlGAUFlkzt/s0hnY2YR9wzpzRHvptyuud3HhPJiR7uNfYF5QdP
pM6rREsEuHw5qSV6uWp9c2IwtxgoFmTmnTU7N0w4ebfnm3aXeAav51X2fL0PStjYj+Sp
VblQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=sPcdi9plosHirG7YPp92pnkc7kEhJBgycSCjEnJxNNo=;
b=jfkOYDliGEOZY7wcaQ9A6oRZrTxzVSC9sGXdgUWJ0/xldMEVIvAOHaDJlq/TkNqk26
6W9Xj8BJjEF7+XVzcGLUvFeJbj+pO88ovQJPDPyDlCEavJ426q456nAPACNTgmcHBjf0
CkSLCrt43Am4CubwrEwihJgoScLreRWpPQl7Hpqq/XlEllZZ55M0wsEHQ0DlYqLmL7TP
dCxOHd/03ZHlwvinEFHn2HKXQDpTj3aCokYmKQ8JbwanIKAqMopl4c6u9HKKFAe1RVOT
qoyDG5uA6ZYLkHE0dWrXzwobwx5Mu9DI+MBylwBpAxT413V8NM2MI0hc63nSVrp6wpIV
QzCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gdEQNB31cGzHrLVV3KHsn45p/O9374mpP/DtIU0H1tODZSlu7
8oZQhRFhHBtvv9BqDM4qB+oKhNFNndNv6Nk1Bx4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZY0zgNB1GxRfUJ7wRVv47AzW/zvm2ID7VS0D28z8D2RIFuG4rreRMthyyfpNNeeRAgpzgeok7pHUMOFX2qAA=
X-Received: by 2002:a54:408b:: with SMTP id i11mr10177978oii.67.1624868591524;
Mon, 28 Jun 2021 01:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <bea8122aea550f1141170829aac252af@riseup.net>
<6leV9mViysrSOipJqrCM3wbqBOMO2gWI3BuEn0VKmaDf7GpawWyUIWLu-ddypMri7YeVmw94HNSaQYYp8fIkjZ0S3OtFTPQa6h9pkLprKDI=@protonmail.com>
<9c2cec326adee1f4d4152e2195da0e7b@riseup.net>
<ly7o0mtsw7cm0sY-R_TMlTzEDixdQkLhAJJP5-3zEthlJEO9IqUPtb_BkAT-fmltTr1juvZ8SYrQ73-ElSlOfGWlKRTX6FAV5mHQC6NbNt8=@protonmail.com>
<edee179d873eb9db551204561db17e90@riseup.net>
<A5gXRNtpLIWjF8Uq7CRLiwl9mb1eEY7IW7AQfQL_7uW9cXCKLn6FdOyYKBq1Dl1L-vgCBwFUgC873WyEEpS6K9F7ct4mdwRMKco01xsWhHg=@protonmail.com>
<c2e7b6336190c5dae6383abb284c335b@riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <c2e7b6336190c5dae6383abb284c335b@riseup.net>
From: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 02:23:00 -0600
Message-ID: <CADvTj4rD90A7FeBw8T_SvDupm0z7CfuXKZ2S=hR0A8CFv0-bSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: raymo@riseup.net,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Boost Bitcoin circulation,
Million Transactions Per Second with stronger privacy
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 08:23:13 -0000
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 2:09 AM raymo via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Hi ZmnSCPxj,
>
> Why you get the signal =E2=80=9Ctrust the Gazin wallet=E2=80=9D?
> Sabu is a protocol and the Gazin wallet will be an implementation of
> that protocol. We will implement it in react-native language to support
> both Android and iPhone. Of course it will be open source and GPL3.
> Here is the repository and yet is empty :)
> https://github.com/raymaot/Gazin
>
> I wonder why you do not look carefully into the proposal! IMHO the Sabu
> will be far better than Lightning.
> Can=E2=80=99t you see the fact that in Sabu you do not need open and clos=
e
> channels ever? Can you imagine only this feature how dramatically
> decrease the transactions cost and how increase the distribution of
> nodes and improve privacy level? it makes every mobile wallet act like a
> lightning network.
> Did you note the fact that in Sabu protocol there is no routing? And the
> only people knew about a transaction are issuer and creditor? No one
> else won=E2=80=99t be aware of transactions and million transactions per =
second
> can be sent and received and repeal dynamically without any footprint on
> any DLT?
>
> The English is not my mother language and probably my paper is not a
> smooth and easy to read paper, but these are not good excuse to not even
> reading a technical paper carefully and before understanding it or at
> least trying to understanding it start to complaining.
Considering that you have not effectively addressed any of the inaccurate
assumptions made regarding how mining works that I pointed out earlier
I assume your proposal is not viable in practice.
See:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-June/019091.ht=
ml
>
> > All the benefits your scheme claims, are derived from the trust assumpt=
ion
> No, All the benefits my scheme claims, are derived from economically
> rational decision of both issuer and creditors.
>
> Regards
> Raymo
>
>
>
> On 2021-06-28 05:20, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> > Good morning Raymo,
> >
> >>
> >> It looks you already missed the entire design of Sabu and its
> >> restrictions. First of all, the Gazin wallet always controls the Sabu
> >> restrictions for every transaction in order to consider it as a valid
> >> transaction in a valid deal. That is, the creditor wallet controls the
> >> MT and GT in first place.
> >
> > Stop right there.
> >
> > From the above, what I get is, "trust the Gazin wallet".
> > Thus, the suggestion to just use Coinbase.
> > At least it has existed longer and has more current users that trust
> > it, rather than this Gazin thing.
> >
> >
> > Is Gazin open-source?
> >
> > * If Gazin is open-source, I could download the source code, make a
> > local copy that gives me a separate copy of the keys, and use the keys
> > to sign any transaction I want.
> > * If Gazin is not open-source, then why should I trust the Gazin
> > wallet until my incoming funds to an open-source wallet I control have
> > been confirmed deeply?
> >
> > Lightning is still superior because:
> >
> > * It can be open-sourced completely and even though I have keys to my
> > onchain funds, I *still* cannot steal the funds of my counterparty.
> > * Even if I connect my open-source node to a node with a closed-source
> > implementation, I know I can rely on receives from that node without
> > waiting for the transaction to be confirmed deeply.
> >
> >
> > All the benefits your scheme claims, are derived from the trust
> > assumption, which is uninteresting, we already have those, they are
> > called custodial wallets.
> > Lightning allows for non-custodiality while achieving high global TPS
> > and low fees.
> > And a central idea of Lightning is the requirement to use an n-of-n to
> > form smaller sub-moneys from the global money.
> >
> > Regards,
> > ZmnSCPxj
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
