1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <adam@cypherspace.org>) id 1WQyWP-0001q7-Ax
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:26:01 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WQyWN-0000wM-VR
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:26:01 +0000
Received: from netbook (c107-70.i07-27.onvol.net [92.251.107.70])
by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
id 0Lhgpl-1WwAPq0FhB-00msXS; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:25:51 -0400
Received: by netbook (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 361EA2E0B99; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:25:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by flare (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 1000);
Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:25:43 +0100
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:25:42 +0100
From: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Message-ID: <20140321122542.GA2686@netbook.cypherspace.org>
References: <CANEZrP3nQfvDArKTRgje0Cus4G2JD_zpxSjA3fXfxM2TNAP80Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CALDj+BafD+6KTNcYDBEu5gNPzYozSkiC-JCxrY-PzXL2DYBRsw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0N4J_Z907+D0ENSNKfNAW2N=7Jf4JzSCO=SU558GtGTzA@mail.gmail.com>
<lge7nk$3mf$2@ger.gmane.org>
<CANEZrP0J849oDvMWjf8LWi0xj44Q8DaUwDip5_smVBMNgeQ3mw@mail.gmail.com>
<20140320121221.GA25052@netbook.cypherspace.org>
<lgh438$tnn$1@ger.gmane.org>
<20140321105906.GA1725@netbook.cypherspace.org>
<CANEZrP2bG_r08vYDZZY4Hg6M+tZFzyQj7SVQ1syZwgv=+F=DqQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP1=69DsDoBC6DmD+ZfwV2nEW2JcJbDy4PHoUYxbQYNzeg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1=69DsDoBC6DmD+ZfwV2nEW2JcJbDy4PHoUYxbQYNzeg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Hashcash: 1:20:140321:mike@plan99.net::jTrvOiqd+u3XSg9Z:005wV3
X-Hashcash: 1:20:140321:andreas@schildbach.de::wterZ2Y17IaVIbfh:0000000000000000
0000000000000000000000002tdM
X-Hashcash: 1:20:140321:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net::u554cE3rItrl0
Qc/:000000000000000000003p+7
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:f/NH8AZy24Z52FpztwAjBT27glpZT7zeRWeobY4Am1T
+Y0AJasxopJqnOg/E6EGfH+OGJ1dLPH8O7TEq08w0XSQTabgTC
FsiLqrKNrObtIAKn879gvZ4xanFDWTxzpm1p6eTPwLuLM9+BcS
5Hf+zbYA0JoG+0l5+/40rNtDRJahkYTPVyDbCFOK+oQeQfLDI0
x5H3/JSkU5dy4YTmN+o7JOxwppyGuTE4WsscMon4aDzEVRGHO4
13ZJ4+QHnm7SxHuurwsa/NX85sirdmCVZTBDp6so5E9X0OEswP
4F6p+RTOchM2gHl6JFrXPzp2kT9qgUcCjo4DcuF0B3rDXFbkyh
z0mMOjUjkNXoIyZXP67pC89E7PvLmg2Ojy82FNraT
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [74.208.4.194 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1WQyWN-0000wM-VR
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol for Face-to-face Payments
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:26:01 -0000
According to Bernstein it's patent FUD (expired, ancient and solid prior
art).
http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/2013-August/005126.html
Adam
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:33:57PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Oh, one other reason I found - apparently RIM, at least in the past,
> has been telling CA's that they need to pay mad bux for the Certicom
> ECC patents. So that's another reason why most certs are still using
> RSA.
|
