summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/af/87fa996f8afef60391778b52281fa4bbeb0c03
blob: 31ef936dcbd840869788ba0c7c7dbb9ef6767229 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1WrMqG-0008Cp-LM
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 02 Jun 2014 07:39:36 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.223.178 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.223.178; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ie0-f178.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WrMqF-00028t-JJ
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 02 Jun 2014 07:39:36 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id rl12so4140759iec.9
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.87.102 with SMTP id w6mr17281169igz.31.1401694769769;
	Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.60.195 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 00:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADZB0_YZ==Kd-R10d996E=6X-VoVhyE0cvW=_LGXJvQLAbVUpw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADZB0_YZ==Kd-R10d996E=6X-VoVhyE0cvW=_LGXJvQLAbVUpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 09:39:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJCMMTvVvg+jNpSSfOawDZk8TYS56OzA7GhFrUEDUPzwwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Angel Leon <gubatron@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(laanwj[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WrMqF-00028t-JJ
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [QT] Feature proposal: Displaying current
 Units/Changing Units with status bar control.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 07:39:36 -0000

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Angel Leon <gubatron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here's how it looks (see attachment), just wanted to get feedback, if this
> is something you also consider valuable in terms of user experience, or
> maybe you don't want to allow any more controls on the status bar (because
> then people will want to add more and more)

Looks good to me.

Though we already allow specifying a unit in all places where the user
can specify a BTC amount.

We also already show the unit in all places where amounts are shown,
except the tables, would be good to add a [unit] in the header there
as well, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/3970 .

If that is done, I'm not sure how much a global setting in the status
bar would add. It may make it more apparent to the user that multiple
units can be selected.

Wladimir