1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1Z2m5N-0005mc-90
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:54:53 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.214.180; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
helo=mail-ob0-f180.google.com;
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Z2m5L-0004ZS-Rt
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:54:53 +0000
Received: by obbsn1 with SMTP id sn1so18833360obb.1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=ndLzu+J3fp3WIrqbvlfSdrszazknCGMmxlZlbSxQY58=;
b=IAspPh1Oev5M+ESgwNfr2Q3pSKzA5L/z49kG93tm8RdVIylZ3CABdB6XEl7l7nCAkm
J30hMoAY56ZwPr5y2RoEaAqQmsdKGcieaw8yOkFuYN1oIej7BFu0hx8V9jrTGrqD0Xs9
DQJDqOyMRefysgo3de9qPD8AXPUxQW5Y3CziQwY9lKFdRlM5m/a624RBZRNUWet31eE8
T8Z3GEoZOMw4/NPIrvFObunYkTC//zfn6V6Z6NkksqDekBYWd6FXsR5/vIQCDjkVq/01
eaKmeaXag99t7KzvQywwoEAKRKIuUzok+S9XTDRe23PH+W+tuqegipjzfLC5lUxz0fQe
NNYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlxv8LhwpTsjpbJ1Bhr+v/j+m65Rb+pM3pdh8ZBqW/SiBo6bDFROivqSP++V28kyQCCmSAF
X-Received: by 10.202.102.227 with SMTP id m96mr4064899oik.98.1433966086274;
Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.108.149 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55788924.6090008@AndySchroder.com>
References: <1943127.DBnVxmfOIh@1337h4x0r>
<20150610093556.GA11409@amethyst.visucore.com>
<557869F9.8030109@AndySchroder.com> <557883A7.7030906@sky-ip.org>
<55788924.6090008@AndySchroder.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:54:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0OHN-ouh5zXAHh-hTWd=Uh1TvhhxZQd_h3ChCKvbo7-0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andy Schroder <info@andyschroder.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140a1ba31578705182f3fa3
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Z2m5L-0004ZS-Rt
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough
to host this list?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:54:53 -0000
--001a1140a1ba31578705182f3fa3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Andy Schroder <info@andyschroder.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A couple of motivations for a mailing list switch:
>
> 1. Sometimes the mailing list delays delivery for 10 minutes to
> several days.
> 2. There are usually lots of ads at the footer of the messages. Really
> confuses new readers (for me at least), and seems like it really pollutes
> such a historical dialog that may be referenced long into the future. How
> would it be if the 10 Commandments, Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, The Sermon
> on the Mount, or The Gettysburg Address had ads intertwined within them?
> 3. Don't think HTML messages are allowed.
> 4. Seems like digital signatures are always broken on messages because
> the list server slightly modifies them (?), so my e-mail client doesn't
> verify them all.
>
> Not only -- mail header rewrites cause all my emails to go into people's
spam folders, if they were not directly listed in the To/CC headers...
>
> 1.
>
>
>
> Andy Schroder
>
> On 06/10/2015 02:36 PM, s7r wrote:
>
> The mail list is public, so it's not like the data on it is somehow
> sensitive. Sourcefoge is fine, it has a nice web UI where you can browse
> the message and sort/order them as you want, etc.
>
> Why would you want to move to a paid solution? And why would you want
> users to have to pay per message? This is the worst idea ever from my
> point of view. We want to encourage people to join the community, run
> full nodes, ask questions, come with solutions, ideas for improvements
> and so on. Everyone should read and write and contribute as much as
> possible with ideas in debates. You never know who can have bright ideas
> in some contexts.
>
> Bottom line is so far sourceforge handles the mail lists just fine. I
> don't see a single advantage another mail list provider / system could
> offer, except some headache and extra work for migration. The software
> distribution via sourcefoge was cancelled for obvious reasons which I
> fully understand and agree to, but it has nothing to do with the mail
> lists. We have way more important things to brainstorm about.
>
> On 6/10/2015 7:46 PM, Andy Schroder wrote:
>
> Regarding changing the e-mail list provider. Is anyone interested in
> sponsoring it? There are non-free options, but it may be difficult to
> always ensure the fee is being paid to the provider. I think finding an
> agreeable free solution may have been the issue before? I've also
> thought of trying to make a pay per message or byte solution (and this
> cost could be dynamic based upon the number of current mailing list
> subscribers). This could solve the who pays problem (the sender pays),
> as well as motivate people to be more concise and clear with their
> messages, and at the same time limit spam.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Andy Schroder
>
> On 06/10/2015 05:35 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:25:12AM +0200, xor wrote:
>
> http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%80%99t-download-software-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/
>
> All our downloads (even old ones) have recently been deleted from sourceforge, for this reason. They haven't been mentioned in Bitcon Core release announcements for a long time.
>
> No opinion on the mailing list. Though I think it's less urgent. The issue of moving the mailinglist has come up before a few times and people can't agree where to move to.
>
> Wladimir
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing listBitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
--001a1140a1ba31578705182f3fa3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Andy Schroder <span dir=3D"ltr"><<=
a href=3D"mailto:info@andyschroder.com" target=3D"_blank">info@andyschroder=
.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"ma=
rgin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
=20
=20
=20
<div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" text=3D"#000000">
<div>Hello,<br>
<br>
A couple of motivations for a mailing list switch:<br>
<ol>
<li>Sometimes the mailing list delays delivery for 10 minutes to
several days.</li>
<li>There are usually lots of ads at the footer of the messages.
Really confuses new readers (for me at least), and seems like
it really pollutes such a historical dialog that may be
referenced long into the future. How would it be if the 10
Commandments, Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, The Sermon on the
Mount, or The Gettysburg Address had ads intertwined within
them?<br>
</li>
<li>Don't think HTML messages are allowed.</li>
<li>Seems like digital signatures are always broken on messages
because the list server slightly modifies them (?), so my
e-mail client doesn't verify them all.</li></ol></div></div><=
/blockquote><div>Not only -- mail header rewrites cause all my emails to go=
into people's spam folders, if they were not directly listed in the To=
/CC headers...</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc s=
olid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" text=3D"#000000"><div><ol><=
li><span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
</font></span></li><span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">
</font></span></ol><span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">
<br>
<br>
<pre cols=3D"72">Andy Schroder</pre></font></span><div><div class=3D"=
h5">
On 06/10/2015 02:36 PM, s7r wrote:<br>
</div></div></div><div><div class=3D"h5">
<blockquote type=3D"cite">
<pre>The mail list is public, so it's not like the data on it is =
somehow
sensitive. Sourcefoge is fine, it has a nice web UI where you can browse
the message and sort/order them as you want, etc.
Why would you want to move to a paid solution? And why would you want
users to have to pay per message? This is the worst idea ever from my
point of view. We want to encourage people to join the community, run
full nodes, ask questions, come with solutions, ideas for improvements
and so on. Everyone should read and write and contribute as much as
possible with ideas in debates. You never know who can have bright ideas
in some contexts.
Bottom line is so far sourceforge handles the mail lists just fine. I
don't see a single advantage another mail list provider / system could
offer, except some headache and extra work for migration. The software
distribution via sourcefoge was cancelled for obvious reasons which I
fully understand and agree to, but it has nothing to do with the mail
lists. We have way more important things to brainstorm about.
On 6/10/2015 7:46 PM, Andy Schroder wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type=3D"cite">
<pre>Regarding changing the e-mail list provider. Is anyone interes=
ted in=20
sponsoring it? There are non-free options, but it may be difficult to=20
always ensure the fee is being paid to the provider. I think finding an=20
agreeable free solution may have been the issue before? I've also=20
thought of trying to make a pay per message or byte solution (and this=20
cost could be dynamic based upon the number of current mailing list=20
subscribers). This could solve the who pays problem (the sender pays),=20
as well as motivate people to be more concise and clear with their=20
messages, and at the same time limit spam.
Any thoughts?
Andy Schroder
On 06/10/2015 05:35 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type=3D"cite">
<pre>On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:25:12AM +0200, xor wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type=3D"cite">
<pre><a href=3D"http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%=
80%99t-download-software-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/" target=3D"_b=
lank">http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%80%99t-download-softwa=
re-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>All our downloads (even old ones) have recently been deleted=
from sourceforge, for this reason. They haven't been mentioned in Bitc=
on Core release announcements for a long time.
No opinion on the mailing list. Though I think it's less urgent. The is=
sue of moving the mailinglist has come up before a few times and people can=
't agree where to move to.
Wladimir
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>--------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" target=3D"_bla=
nk">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
<br>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_signature">Jeff Garzik<br>Bitcoin core developer and open sourc=
e evangelist<br>BitPay, Inc. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://bitpay.=
com/" target=3D"_blank">https://bitpay.com/</a></div>
</div></div>
--001a1140a1ba31578705182f3fa3--
|
