summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/aa/336ca4e67635c2f301569ea18b417b5f2931c9
blob: 179e8e18bcf458aef22017a10496117298b1eaf1 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Return-Path: <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A37B360
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 14 May 2016 14:08:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.sldev.cz (mail.sldev.cz [51.254.7.247])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 024DB177
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 14 May 2016 14:08:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54025E5B5;
	Sat, 14 May 2016 14:09:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sldev.cz
Received: from mail.sldev.cz ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mail.sl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id nkt2DDAww08c; Sat, 14 May 2016 14:09:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tetra.site (unknown [10.8.8.107])
	by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2888E45B;
	Sat, 14 May 2016 14:09:24 +0000 (UTC)
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <5735D3A4.7090608@mycelium.com> <nh6ieb$tq0$1@ger.gmane.org>
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Message-ID: <57373157.9090408@satoshilabs.com>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 16:08:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <nh6ieb$tq0$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bip44 extension for P2SH/P2WSH/...
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 14:08:27 -0000

On 14/05/16 09:00, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> The whole idea of BIP43 (which BIP44 bases on) is that how these BIPs
> define balance retrieval never changes. This is to make sure you always
> see the same balance on "same BIP" wallets (and same seed of course).

This! Thanks Andreas for formulating my thought that I was not able to
articulate earlier.

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol "stick" Rusnak
SatoshiLabs.com