blob: cffa7d979f12a306f0a8707d91b6ecb8f0f854a8 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <bgroff@lavabit.com>) id 1R5gHn-0004m4-Ed
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:01:35 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of lavabit.com
designates 72.249.41.33 as permitted sender)
client-ip=72.249.41.33; envelope-from=bgroff@lavabit.com;
helo=karen.lavabit.com;
Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1R5gHh-00068m-QE for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:01:35 +0000
Received: from a.earth.lavabit.com (a.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.10])
by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B75D11BC07;
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:01:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lavabit.com (anonymizer2.blutmagie.de [192.251.226.206])
by lavabit.com with ESMTP id CA92GZNP7H9S;
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:01:24 -0500
Received: from 192.251.226.206 (SquirrelMail authenticated user bgroff)
by lavabit.com with HTTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:01:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <21269.192.251.226.206.1316448084.squirrel@lavabit.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0fb61B6bqGMhWtCgvy0xwfHQ_nvmhbb9uLJQWx3biENhVJNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201109182104.45994.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAL0fb61B6bqGMhWtCgvy0xwfHQ_nvmhbb9uLJQWx3biENhVJNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:01:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: bgroff@lavabit.com
To: "Alex Waters" <ampedal@gmail.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
X-Headers-End: 1R5gHh-00068m-QE
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Enhancement Proposals (BEPS)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:01:35 -0000
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/ is a good reference if you're
> interested in seeing how PEPs work in action. I would be more than
> willing to maintain a similar index if that's what people want.
Would the multi-signature proposal be a good test case for BEP-0002?
https://gist.github.com/dba89537d352d591eb36
I can reformat it and email here.
Gavin has a competing one: https://gist.github.com/39158239e36f6af69d6f
and I have a pull request matching a previous version of my proposal.
--
Bobby Groff
|
