1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
|
Return-Path: <aj@erisian.com.au>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3070C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:01:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3B481CAF
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:01:59 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 7A3B481CAF
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id gN5H2ygObjzw
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:01:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 5A38881CAD
Received: from azure.erisian.com.au (azure.erisian.com.au [172.104.61.193])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A38881CAD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:01:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from aj@azure.erisian.com.au (helo=sapphire.erisian.com.au)
by azure.erisian.com.au with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Debian))
id 1p4wUL-0004yC-NR; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:01:55 +1000
Received: by sapphire.erisian.com.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:01:50 +1000
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:01:50 +1000
From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
To: 0xB10C <b10c@b10c.me>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <Y5f5LtJFZP0c9Lst@erisian.com.au>
References: <Y2I3w8O5X55sD/3C@petertodd.org> <Y2qc7Ubc5xtJhxGw@petertodd.org>
<Y3MlSE7AWkBgiCyr@erisian.com.au>
<f146ca66-a611-f129-ae11-6907a7333d10@b10c.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f146ca66-a611-f129-ae11-6907a7333d10@b10c.me>
X-Spam-Score-int: -18
X-Spam-Bar: -
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Announcement: Full-RBF Miner Bounty
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:01:59 -0000
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 05:04:05PM +0100, 0xB10C via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> For further monitoring, I've set-up a mempoolfullrbf=1 node and are
> logging replacement events with [0]. I filter the full-RBF replacements
> and list the replaced and replacement transactions here:
> https://fullrbf.mempool.observer/
I think it would be helpful to list (a) how long ago the replaced
transaction was seen compared to the [full RBF event] timestamp, and (b)
particularly for cases where the replaced tx was the one that was mined,
how long after the [full RBF event] the block was received.
Might be more hassle than it's worth, but you might consider grouping
all related replacements together, so that you can see:
2b771b7949e62434bf3002ad0d38f383a29b362cf2dc31627a35a883d0de36c3
[2601.19 sat/vb]
9ce405ab14e8d68c7a43d190414e39564d90bbee21f23020f2ce45136927ce9b
[2448.25 sat/vb]
1a5f239e7fc008f337605e0b405579234d0fecebaf6be966000dcfaf0bcb7beb
[2295.31 sat/vb]
0500a3ca5e4998fb273be9b51a4c3a75780acf28b23409a54f4260e069441e32
[2142.37 sat/vb]
955623c789eb0a7ca0848ce964325d6b2c7d1731a686d573018f6348de6c00a1
[1989.42 sat/vb]
7838bc60405f9b38a79c94f4f045b8debaf41c0a5acfdeebc6a3904188b2bbc9
[1836.48 sat/vb]
2d5e6b84602d45c5c834e0cad4db4dd8a9142ba7eff6bacdb34a97e5cfacb418
[1683.54 sat/vb]
130851951a1d9270776852491bda3e17bb08b9309e5b76b206633f88a9341604
[1530.60 sat/vb]
3c9b2530c02a22c966fa9ef60ec0acf17bd23a8b0b4c5202589c190ee770c880
[1377,66 sat/vb]
49889043ec7dae7a4f1573c5feaca6a549d88e4fb306cf3b410155ba919da83d
[1224.72 sat/vb]
861156e18ae0399cd458c6f7f7faed1a94142db45f1d879b9ae78cb11cd7e96c
[1071.78 sat/vb]
961bf21f1fc35edacd4929e8db67b27a52c69a593d32aab5a024757503c0490b
[ 918.84 sat/vb]
5cdb24e2ed30dfc55b23820676a9d47d158fec982e77dddadc648280f0b2c914
[ 765.90 sat/vb]
159494115af33b414df77d3965de5eb191b4a3af1c1219509f3175abc5dcd132
[ 612.95 sat/vb]
dcf4c0e688ee76188e9ef829d03cc66ee7da404717b9d56d74bcd75708612271
[ 460.01 sat/vb]
1971d9122551a898bcbc5183d4ea79e273dea89aa4075d4e014f8f7dd4eb8321
[ 307.07 sat/vb]
c43316d2e4bb12fbb408de01d64c4b480fd7d6875db4ebbf006fdc7579546d13
[ 154.13 sat/vb]
8bbf6a0f3dd8358c6d8a81f0811216d7980288b14daeac82ff2f672ea8e4851d
[ 1.19 sat/vb]
[mined in 767044]
at a glance as a single block (ideally with timestamps).
Arguably, that might be interesting to see in general (ie for bip-125
opt-in rbf txs as well), to see how common the "offer a low fee, and
raise it over time" approach is in practice.
Cheers,
aj
|
