1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <etotheipi@gmail.com>) id 1WN4WB-0006N3-9K
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:01:39 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.216.179; envelope-from=etotheipi@gmail.com;
helo=mail-qc0-f179.google.com;
Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WN4W7-0003Zn-Ej
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:01:39 +0000
Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id m20so8236087qcx.10
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.229.50.6 with SMTP id x6mr36161517qcf.8.1394474489947;
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (c-76-111-96-126.hsd1.md.comcast.net.
[76.111.96.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
h46sm27485148qgd.10.2014.03.10.11.01.28
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <531DFDF8.80008@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:01:28 -0400
From: Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CANAnSg3Bt0e7CfUcJXe96xhU6nqif9ey_vurZMZkSa9OHjHStw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T0SMi6Gp4JY=CpHxLEu5pVkvDmnug7PsY7m_dvtT7khzg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T0SMi6Gp4JY=CpHxLEu5pVkvDmnug7PsY7m_dvtT7khzg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------020008060909000309020903"
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(etotheipi[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WN4W7-0003Zn-Ej
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Multisign payment protocol?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:01:39 -0000
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020008060909000309020903
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Then of course I tried to do this with BIP 10
<https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0010.mediawiki> when
Armory implemented offline-transactions two years ago. I got some
positive feedback, but no one wanted to help improve it, etc. I guess
nobody else was doing it and/or cared at the time. So I continue to use
BIP 10 even though it's pretty crappy. I wanted it to be useful for
multisig, too, but it has some deficiencies there (it was done when
Armory was extremely young and OP_EVAL was still on the table).
However, with all this activity, we should start thinking about that and
discussing it. Otherwise, I'll just do my own thing again and probably
end up with something that fits my own needs, but not anyone else's.
Really though, multisig shouldn't require all the same app to work.
-Alan
On 03/10/2014 01:49 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> In my experience, best process for standardizing something is:
>
> 1) Somebody has a great idea
> 2) They implement it
> 3) Everybody agrees, "Great idea!" and they copy it.
> 4) Idea gets refined by the people copying it.
> 5) It gets standardized.
>
> Mutisig wallets are at step 2 right now. BIP is step 5, in my humble
> opinion...
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Drak <drak@zikula.org
> <mailto:drak@zikula.org>> wrote:
>
> I was wondering if there would be merit in a kind of BIP for a
> payment protocol using multisig?
>
> Currently, setting up a multisig is quite a feat. Users have to
> exchange public keys, work out how to get the public keys from
> their addresses. If one of the parties are not savvy enough, an
> malicious party could easily be setup that was 2 of 3 instead of 2
> of 2 where the malicious party generates the multisig
> address+script and thus be able to run off with funds anyway.
>
> It's also terribly complex to generate and keep track of. There's
> been a nice attempt at creating an browser interface at
> coinb.in/multisig <http://coinb.in/multisig> but it still lacks
> the kind of ease with created by the payment protocol. If there
> was a BIP then it would go a long way to aiding future usability
> of multisig wallet implementations.
>
> What are your thoughts?
>
> Drak
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases
> and their
> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Gavin Andresen
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--------------020008060909000309020903
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Then of course I tried to do this with <a
href="https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0010.mediawiki">BIP
10 </a> when Armory implemented offline-transactions two years
ago. I got some positive feedback, but no one wanted to help
improve it, etc. I guess nobody else was doing it and/or cared at
the time. So I continue to use BIP 10 even though it's pretty
crappy. I wanted it to be useful for multisig, too, but it has some
deficiencies there (it was done when Armory was extremely young and
OP_EVAL was still on the table).<br>
<br>
However, with all this activity, we should start thinking about that
and discussing it. Otherwise, I'll just do my own thing again and
probably end up with something that fits my own needs, but not
anyone else's. Really though, multisig shouldn't require all the
same app to work.<br>
<br>
-Alan<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/10/2014 01:49 PM, Gavin Andresen
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABsx9T0SMi6Gp4JY=CpHxLEu5pVkvDmnug7PsY7m_dvtT7khzg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">In my experience, best process for standardizing
something is:
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1) Somebody has a great idea</div>
<div>2) They implement it</div>
<div>3) Everybody agrees, "Great idea!" and they copy it.</div>
<div>4) Idea gets refined by the people copying it.</div>
<div>5) It gets standardized.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Mutisig wallets are at step 2 right now. BIP is step 5, in
my humble opinion...</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Drak <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:drak@zikula.org" target="_blank">drak@zikula.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">I was wondering if there would be merit in a
kind of BIP for a payment protocol using multisig?
<div><br>
<div>Currently, setting up a multisig is quite a feat.
Users have to exchange public keys, work out how to
get the public keys from their addresses. If one of
the parties are not savvy enough, an malicious party
could easily be setup that was 2 of 3 instead of 2 of
2 where the malicious party generates the multisig
address+script and thus be able to run off with funds
anyway.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It's also terribly complex to generate and keep
track of. There's been a nice attempt at creating an
browser interface at <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://coinb.in/multisig" target="_blank">coinb.in/multisig</a>
but it still lacks the kind of ease with created by
the payment protocol. If there was a BIP then it would
go a long way to aiding future usability of multisig
wallet implementations.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>What are your thoughts?</div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Drak</div>
</font></span></div>
</div>
<br>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book<br>
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph
databases and their<br>
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the
field,<br>
this first edition is now available. Download your free book
today!<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech" target="_blank">http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development"
target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
--<br>
Gavin Andresen<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech">http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech</a></pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------020008060909000309020903--
|
