path: root/a6/f1b12c3ed9006d970c78e9049b96a9be3d3140

Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <g.rowe.froot@gmail.com>) id 1Swx0B-0003bo-Fl
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:07:51 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.220.175; envelope-from=g.rowe.froot@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-vc0-f175.google.com; 
Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Swx07-0003TU-0I
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:07:51 +0000
Received: by vcbfy27 with SMTP id fy27so8625665vcb.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 02 Aug 2012 08:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.59.1.193 with SMTP id bi1mr9370930ved.57.1343920061445; Thu,
	02 Aug 2012 08:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: g.rowe.froot@gmail.com
Received: by 10.58.22.234 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 08:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5019153B.3090001@mistfpga.net>
References: <5019153B.3090001@mistfpga.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 16:07:41 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tyGl9Te9lLDGVMj1orn_vFL0Qjo
Message-ID: <CAKm8k+2X8Tode5foBSmVGjbvtL8rkRKqNXKLTnmdnbS6FQxyOg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gary Rowe <g.rowe@froot.co.uk>
To: Bitcoin Development List <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc9b6ade74e104c649c575
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(g.rowe.froot[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Swx07-0003TU-0I
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Testing Project
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:07:51 -0000

--047d7bdc9b6ade74e104c649c575
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Steve,

This looks like a good idea to me. The test suites could act similarly to
the 100% Pure Java approach that successfully fended off a lot of
corrupting influences to Java over the years.

Maybe it's worth putting together a small starter suite of tests and
showing them to the community then providing a suitable process, perhaps
through BIPs, to allow tests to be created, reviewed and updated before
getting incorporated into a reference. I imagine a BIP would cover an
aspect of the blockchain rather than a single test or test suite since
having that many BIPs would get onerous fast.

Kind regards,

Gary

On 1 August 2012 12:38, steve <steve@mistfpga.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I know most of you have more important things to do, and not enough
> time as it is, but I would really like your feedback on the testing
> project.
>
> Bettermeans seemed ideal, it allowed for leaderless leadership with
> people being able to dip in and out of what they wanted to do.
> however it seems that bettermeans is in no way a finished product and
> is rotting fast.
>
> I would like to move away from bettermeans - whilst retaining the
> voting and sub workstream style of working.  I would like to set
> something up around MantisBT (Mantis Bug Tracker) - this is an
> exceptionally versatile bit of software with plugins and interaction
> with other testing products (everything from test setups and plans to
> test runs and results) I would go as far as saying it is industry
> standard (yeah, i know about bugzilla, etc. mantis beats them all
> hands down.) obviously we would need a wiki and other software - this
> is not a problem.
>
> I am happpy to pay for the VPS' to host this stuff and set it all up.
>
> I have quite a bit of experience with mantis and other opensource
> testing stuff.
>
> I see the testing of bitcoin to be very similar to the testing process
> in the games industry.  for those that do not know how this works it
> is like this:-
>
> A company comes up with a device (xbox/ps),
> They then publish a set of dos and donts for this device (TRC for sony
> and TCRs for microsoft.  - I wrote quite a few of the MS TCR's for the
> original xbox.)
> They (ms/sony) then test your game against these rules and depending
> on how many you pass/fail your game can be released or not.
>
> I see this as mapping to bitcoin very well, the device is the
> blockchain, and the TRC/TCR _tests_ are published so third party
> developers can see how they fair [look at gavins recent blockchain
> edge cases for an example] (ms/sony do not publish their testcases
> only the requirements)
>
> I believe that this will allow the bitcoin testing project to be able
> to cope with the stable builds, bleeding edge builds and 3rd party
> implementations all at the same time.
>
> It doesnt matter what the app is, it is its interaction with the
> blockchain, the safe guarding of the blockchain and compatibility with
> the previous/future versions that are tested.
>
> [for the bitcoin dev list]
> A little about me:-
> The below is more or less a cut and paste of some of the stuff I sent
> gavin in my initial email about wanting to be in on the project.
>
> I can back all of this up with references. I can go into more detail if
> needed.
>
> I was heavily involved with setting up the microsoft xbox european cert
> department
> I set up qa department for europes largest independant games developer
> (although they are no longer)
>
> worked for microsoft secure science designing security automation tools
>
> setup the internal pentest for thales e-security (now TITS [Thales
> Information Technology Solutions (or Trotters Independant Traders ;),
> on thier datacryptors (fpga, crypto and product) - have done full test
> cycles on hsm 8000, payshield 9000, dc2k and thier latest line of
> military spec comms equipment.
>
> Setup and pentested Thales and nCiphers credit control software (to
> fips level 4 standard - This shit bitcoin exchanges need!! I know bank
> is a dirty word in the bitcoin world, but we should be at least as
> secure as them)
>
> I currently find exploits in stuff like office, quicktime, ie, ff, etc
> and sell them to companies like ZDI (3com) iDefense (verisgn) and some
> pentest companies that require zero day exploits.
>
> however I would like to ditch this and get my bitcoin related stuff
> off the ground - with the BTP being top of the list.
>
> my spelling is rubbish, and sometimes i forget to spellcheck before i
> hit send. sorry about that.
>
> any feedback would be really appreciated. please! I feel that this has
> stagnated enough and I want to get my work out there and I want it to
> be useful. (I lost 60 or so testcases because Kev left himself logged
> into bettermeans and I added them under his account... none appeared
> on the wiki, none appeared anywhere...)
>
> There is already lots of stuff on the wiki that outlines how i see
> things holding together - but you cant see who posted what because of
> a bug that has appeared recently [meta info is just displayed as its
> meta tag, {name} on {date} wrote.]
>
> as apposed to Mistfpga on 30/8/2012 wrote...
>
> so the tl;dr
> 1 - I want to use something other than bettermeans
> 2 - I can admin opensource software to do the same
> 3 - I want to take the voting/hiearachy style from bettermeans and
> apply it to mantis and test workflow.
> 4 - I want to get some testing done asap.
> 5 - I have a full msdn and technet licence
> 6 - I have a vast array of machines [nearly 100 cores] that I can use
> to automate testing and to test different setups.
> 7 - been mining for 18 months or so.
>
> cheers,
>
> steve
>
> I do not belive this to be related, but I am not ashamed and feel no
> stigma. I have posted this on a public forum. I suffer from fast
> cycling (withing a day) type two bipolar disorder.  This has been and
> is being managed very well by my meds (300mg quetiapine fumerate and
> 30mg mirtrazipine at night) I have been well for over a year now. [and
> yes, even with these mental health problems I still hold SCE clearance]
>
> - --
> my PGP public key is at pgp.mit.edu id: 0x5016FB50
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQGRU7AAoJEFvEB9dQFvtQY9oH/RiNBeWDs+tz0NQgkgtXmxcs
> tDtlLWB91gRtmxvXv+yYHE0WXS/qQ5gwaor8Vek61Cvnhij4AQBf7JVYLj03/7fy
> cMAFJ5k7ZQmH9URo8Jx8xzQ2tLgZ5BqLbP6fTzDstpExNGJlkZvsC6hTx9OFCubU
> bzWuWmcIRzBiMhdz7DPoskOgie5sQRzzO0zrK7NvS1P2hyEhM3eFYFcYecpS8jq9
> SbkH77qnc5pZD2JULq38htVwtI16vxmg/s4GIs3OpEPaMk5xtVc5XHf6gwBZQtYw
> fErwZpNDEAmGidRCB4LAqdSx1Xi0ix7GOyvTxBLWTnfB7wIAQNQpBHB9zN8diiA=
> =am8B
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

--047d7bdc9b6ade74e104c649c575
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Steve,<br><br>This looks like a good idea to me. The test suites could a=
ct similarly to the 100% Pure Java approach that successfully fended off a =
lot of corrupting influences to Java over the years.<br><br>Maybe it&#39;s =
worth putting together a small starter suite of tests and showing them to t=
he community then providing a suitable process, perhaps through BIPs, to al=
low tests to be created, reviewed and updated before getting incorporated i=
nto a reference. I imagine a BIP would cover an aspect of the blockchain ra=
ther than a single test or test suite since having that many BIPs would get=
 onerous fast.<br>
<br>Kind regards,<br><br>Gary<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 1 August=
 2012 12:38, steve <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:steve@mistfpga.n=
et" target=3D"_blank">steve@mistfpga.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquo=
te class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc so=
lid;padding-left:1ex">
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
Hi all,<br>
<br>
I know most of you have more important things to do, and not enough<br>
time as it is, but I would really like your feedback on the testing<br>
project.<br>
<br>
Bettermeans seemed ideal, it allowed for leaderless leadership with<br>
people being able to dip in and out of what they wanted to do.<br>
however it seems that bettermeans is in no way a finished product and<br>
is rotting fast.<br>
<br>
I would like to move away from bettermeans - whilst retaining the<br>
voting and sub workstream style of working. =C2=A0I would like to set<br>
something up around MantisBT (Mantis Bug Tracker) - this is an<br>
exceptionally versatile bit of software with plugins and interaction<br>
with other testing products (everything from test setups and plans to<br>
test runs and results) I would go as far as saying it is industry<br>
standard (yeah, i know about bugzilla, etc. mantis beats them all<br>
hands down.) obviously we would need a wiki and other software - this<br>
is not a problem.<br>
<br>
I am happpy to pay for the VPS&#39; to host this stuff and set it all up.<b=
r>
<br>
I have quite a bit of experience with mantis and other opensource<br>
testing stuff.<br>
<br>
I see the testing of bitcoin to be very similar to the testing process<br>
in the games industry. =C2=A0for those that do not know how this works it<b=
r>
is like this:-<br>
<br>
A company comes up with a device (xbox/ps),<br>
They then publish a set of dos and donts for this device (TRC for sony<br>
and TCRs for microsoft. =C2=A0- I wrote quite a few of the MS TCR&#39;s for=
 the<br>
original xbox.)<br>
They (ms/sony) then test your game against these rules and depending<br>
on how many you pass/fail your game can be released or not.<br>
<br>
I see this as mapping to bitcoin very well, the device is the<br>
blockchain, and the TRC/TCR _tests_ are published so third party<br>
developers can see how they fair [look at gavins recent blockchain<br>
edge cases for an example] (ms/sony do not publish their testcases<br>
only the requirements)<br>
<br>
I believe that this will allow the bitcoin testing project to be able<br>
to cope with the stable builds, bleeding edge builds and 3rd party<br>
implementations all at the same time.<br>
<br>
It doesnt matter what the app is, it is its interaction with the<br>
blockchain, the safe guarding of the blockchain and compatibility with<br>
the previous/future versions that are tested.<br>
<br>
[for the bitcoin dev list]<br>
A little about me:-<br>
The below is more or less a cut and paste of some of the stuff I sent<br>
gavin in my initial email about wanting to be in on the project.<br>
<br>
I can back all of this up with references. I can go into more detail if<br>
needed.<br>
<br>
I was heavily involved with setting up the microsoft xbox european cert<br>
department<br>
I set up qa department for europes largest independant games developer<br>
(although they are no longer)<br>
<br>
worked for microsoft secure science designing security automation tools<br>
<br>
setup the internal pentest for thales e-security (now TITS [Thales<br>
Information Technology Solutions (or Trotters Independant Traders ;),<br>
on thier datacryptors (fpga, crypto and product) - have done full test<br>
cycles on hsm 8000, payshield 9000, dc2k and thier latest line of<br>
military spec comms equipment.<br>
<br>
Setup and pentested Thales and nCiphers credit control software (to<br>
fips level 4 standard - This shit bitcoin exchanges need!! I know bank<br>
is a dirty word in the bitcoin world, but we should be at least as<br>
secure as them)<br>
<br>
I currently find exploits in stuff like office, quicktime, ie, ff, etc<br>
and sell them to companies like ZDI (3com) iDefense (verisgn) and some<br>
pentest companies that require zero day exploits.<br>
<br>
however I would like to ditch this and get my bitcoin related stuff<br>
off the ground - with the BTP being top of the list.<br>
<br>
my spelling is rubbish, and sometimes i forget to spellcheck before i<br>
hit send. sorry about that.<br>
<br>
any feedback would be really appreciated. please! I feel that this has<br>
stagnated enough and I want to get my work out there and I want it to<br>
be useful. (I lost 60 or so testcases because Kev left himself logged<br>
into bettermeans and I added them under his account... none appeared<br>
on the wiki, none appeared anywhere...)<br>
<br>
There is already lots of stuff on the wiki that outlines how i see<br>
things holding together - but you cant see who posted what because of<br>
a bug that has appeared recently [meta info is just displayed as its<br>
meta tag, {name} on {date} wrote.]<br>
<br>
as apposed to Mistfpga on 30/8/2012 wrote...<br>
<br>
so the tl;dr<br>
1 - I want to use something other than bettermeans<br>
2 - I can admin opensource software to do the same<br>
3 - I want to take the voting/hiearachy style from bettermeans and<br>
apply it to mantis and test workflow.<br>
4 - I want to get some testing done asap.<br>
5 - I have a full msdn and technet licence<br>
6 - I have a vast array of machines [nearly 100 cores] that I can use<br>
to automate testing and to test different setups.<br>
7 - been mining for 18 months or so.<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>
<br>
steve<br>
<br>
I do not belive this to be related, but I am not ashamed and feel no<br>
stigma. I have posted this on a public forum. I suffer from fast<br>
cycling (withing a day) type two bipolar disorder. =C2=A0This has been and<=
br>
is being managed very well by my meds (300mg quetiapine fumerate and<br>
30mg mirtrazipine at night) I have been well for over a year now. [and<br>
yes, even with these mental health problems I still hold SCE clearance]<br>
<br>
- --<br>
my PGP public key is at <a href=3D"http://pgp.mit.edu" target=3D"_blank">pg=
p.mit.edu</a> id: 0x5016FB50<br>
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)<br>
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - <a href=3D"http://enigmail.mozdev.org/"=
 target=3D"_blank">http://enigmail.mozdev.org/</a><br>
<br>
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQGRU7AAoJEFvEB9dQFvtQY9oH/RiNBeWDs+tz0NQgkgtXmxcs<br>
tDtlLWB91gRtmxvXv+yYHE0WXS/qQ5gwaor8Vek61Cvnhij4AQBf7JVYLj03/7fy<br>
cMAFJ5k7ZQmH9URo8Jx8xzQ2tLgZ5BqLbP6fTzDstpExNGJlkZvsC6hTx9OFCubU<br>
bzWuWmcIRzBiMhdz7DPoskOgie5sQRzzO0zrK7NvS1P2hyEhM3eFYFcYecpS8jq9<br>
SbkH77qnc5pZD2JULq38htVwtI16vxmg/s4GIs3OpEPaMk5xtVc5XHf6gwBZQtYw<br>
fErwZpNDEAmGidRCB4LAqdSx1Xi0ix7GOyvTxBLWTnfB7wIAQNQpBHB9zN8diiA=3D<br>
=3Dam8B<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
Live Security Virtual Conference<br>
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today&#39;s security and<br>
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions<b=
r>
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware<b=
r>
threats. <a href=3D"http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/5012226=
3/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122=
263/</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>

--047d7bdc9b6ade74e104c649c575--